Didit Ardianto, Indarini Dwi Pursitasari

Judul	:	Do Middle School Science Textbook Enclose an Entity of Science Literacy?
Abstrak	:	This study aims to analyze the middle school of science the textbook based on science literacy. We used descriptive analysis to explore the domain of science literacy at 3 middle science textbooks. Observation Sheet that contain the domain of science literacy (adopted from Chiappetta, Fillman & Sethna) is used to capture the present category of science literacy (body of knowledge, way of investigating, way of thinking, and interaction of science, technology and society) in any textbook. The results showed that middle school science textbooks have not yet provide a balance between body of knowledge, way of Investigating, way of thinking, and interaction of science, technology and society. The Middle science textbooks still dominate with science as a way of knowledge. Middle School science textbook that used  to support science teaching should be provide balance on all four aspects of science  literacy. Therefore, The development that focusing on middle school science textbooks based on science literacy need to be implemented.
Tahun	:	2017	Media Publikasi	:	Jurnal Nasional Blm Akreditasi
Kategori	:	Jurnal	No/Vol/Tahun	:	1 / 1 / 2017
ISSN/ISBN	:	2598-120X
PTN/S	:	UNIVERSITAS pAKUAN	Program Studi	:	PENDIDIKAN ILMU PENGETAHUAN ALAM
Bibliography	:	Adisendjaja, Y.H. 2009. Analisis Buku Ajar Biologi SMA Kelas X di Kota Bandung Berdasarkan Literasi Sains. Makalah. Pendidikan Biologi UPI: tidak diterbikan Alfieri, L., Brooks, P.J. & Aldrich, J.N. 2010. Does Discovery-Based Instruction Enhance Learning?. Journal of educational Psycology. (103)1:1-18. Ardianto, D dan Rubini, B. 2016.  Komparasi Literasi Sains Siswa Pada Pembelajaran IPA Terpadu dengan Model Guided Discovery dan Problem Based Learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia. Brickman, P., Gormally, C., Armstrong N dan Hallar, B. 2009. Effects of Inquiry-Based Learning on Students’science Literacy Skills dnd Confidence. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 3(2). Chiappetta, E.L, Fillman, D.A, dan Sethna, G.H.1991. “A Method to Quantify Major Themes of Scientific Literacy in Science Textbooks”. Journal of research in science teaching, 28(8), 713-725. Chiappetta, E.L, Fillman, D.A, dan Sethna, G.H. 1991. “A Quantitative Analysis of High School Chemistry Textbooks for Scientific Literacy Themes and Expository Learning Aids”. Journal of research in science teaching, 28(10), 939-951. Chiappetta, E.L, Fillman, D.A, dan Sethna, G.H. 1993. “Do Middle School Life Science Textbooks Provide a Balance of Scientific Literacy Themes?”. Journal of research in science teaching, 30(2), 787 – 797 Cochran, W.G. 1991. Teknik Penarikan Sampel Edisi ketiga. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia (UI-Press). Leonard, W.H dan Penick, J. E. 1993. “What’s Important in Selecting a Biology Textbooks?”. Journal of The American Biology Teacher, 55(1), 14 – 19. Lumpe, A. T dan Beck, J. 1996. A Profile of High School Biology Textbooks Using Scientific Literacy Recommendations”. Journal of The American Biology Teacher. 58(3), 147-153. Nbina, J. B. 2013. The Relative Effectiveness of Guided Discovery and Demonstration Teaching Methods on Achievement of Chemistry Students of Different levels of Scientific Literacy. Journal of Research in Education and Society, 4(1) Piraksaa C., Srisawasdib N. & Koulc R. 2014. Effect of Gender on Students’ Scientific Reasoning Ability : A Case Study in Thailand. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 486 – 491. Yusuf. S. 2003. Literasi Siswa Indonesia Laporan PISA 2003. Jakarta: Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan. [Online]. Tersedia: http://www.p4tkipa.org. [18 Juni 2008].
URL	:	https://journal.unpak.ac.id/index.php/jhss/article/view/369