|Judul||:||SCIENCE TEACHERS’ UNDERSTANDING ON SCIENCE LITERACY AND INTEGRATED SCIENCE LEARNING: LESSON FROM TEACHERS TRAINING|
One of the weaknesses of secondary science teachers today is the lack of ability to develop integrated science learning. A descriptive study, followed by a developmental research has been done to determine the factors that caused the weakness, and to find the right solution. In addition, this research involving 25 teachers as subject, has also examined how far the treatment was able to overcome the problems. The descriptive research showed that almost all of the teachers were not skillful enough to teach integrated science. This was due to the teachers’ background, in which not all of them studied the integrated science education. Most of them came from biology, physics and chemistry education. They have actually attended the training (arranged by a government) on integrated science teaching, but it apparently has not succeeded. The eight steps of learning approach has been developed and implemented along the training were: (1) Building common perception on science literacy; (2) integrated science analysis based on current curriculum and lesson analysis; (3) presentation; (4) designing lesson plan in groups; (5) simulation; (6) designing lesson plan individually; (7) evaluation-reflection; and (8) rewards. After the treatment, the teacher’s ability to develop the lesson plans as well as the understanding of integrated science concepts eventually improved much better. Only three teachers have to follow remedial in making lesson plan since they could not meet the requirements
|Tahun||:||2018||Media Publikasi||:||Jurnal Internasional|
|Kategori||:||Jurnal||No/Vol/Tahun||:||7 / 3 / 2018|
|PTN/S||:||UNIVERSITAS pAKUAN||Program Studi||:||PENDIDIKAN ILMU PENGETAHUAN ALAM|
Afriana, J., Permanasari, A & Fitriani. (2016). A. Project Based Learning Integrated To Stem To Enhance Elementary Schools Students Scientific Literacy. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(2), 261-267. Anwar, Y., Rustaman, N.Y & Widodo, A. (2012). Kemampuan Subject Specific Pedagogy Calon Guru Biologi Peserta Program Pendidikan Profesional Guru (PPG) yang Berlatar Belakang Basic Sains Pra dan Post Workshop. Jurnal pendidikan IPA Indonesia,1(2), 157-162. Ardianto, D & Rubini, B. (2016). Comparison of Students’ Scientific Literacy in Integrated Science Learning Through Model of Guided Discovery and Problem Based Learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(1), 31-37. Christenson, N., Rundgren, S.C., dan Zeidler, D.L. (2013). The Relationship of Discipline Background to Upper Secondary Student’s Argumentation on Sosioscientific Issues. Journal of Research in Science education, 43(6), 5-12. Dawson, V. & Carson, K. (2016). Using Climate Change Scenarios to Assess High School Students’ Argumentation Skills. Research in Science & Technological Education, 35(1), 1-16. Dudley P. (2013). Teacher Learning in Lesson Study: What Interaction-Level Discourse Analysis Revealed about How Teachers Utilised Imagination, Tacit Knowledge of Teaching and Fresh Evidence of Pupils Learning, to Develop Practice Knowledge and so Enhance Their Pupils’ Learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 34, 107-121. Ekanayake, S.Y & Wishart, J. (2014). Integrating Mobile Phones into Teaching and Learning: A Case Study of Teacher Training through Professional Development Workshops. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(1), 173-189.
Fakhriyah, F., Masfuah, S., Roysa, M., Rusilowati, A & Rahayu, E. S. (2017). Students Science Literacy in the Aspect of Content Science?. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(1), 81-87. Fradd, S.H., Lee, O., Sutman, F.X & Saxton, M.K. (2015) Promoting Science Literacy with English Language Learners Through Instructional Materials Development: A Case Study. Bilingual Research Journal: The Journal of the National Association for Bilingual Education, 25(4), 479501. Gormally, C., Brickman, P., Hallar, B., & Armstrong, N. (2009). Effects of Inquiry-Based Learning on Students’ Science Literacy Skills and Confidence. International journal for the scholarship of teaching and learning, 3(2), 16. Handayani, R.D., Ryskiadi A., Machrus, A., and Acik, R. (2015). Penerapan Lesson Study untuk Meningkatan Kemampuan Mengajar Mahasiswa Calon Guru Fisika., Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA, 20(1), 27-30. Hart, J.E & Lee,O. (2010). Teacher Professional Development to Improve the Science and Literacy Achievement of English Language Learners. The Journal of the National Association for Bilingual Education, 27(3), 475-501. Holbrook, J., Laius, A., dan Rannikmäe, M. (2003). The Influence of Social Issue-Based Science Teaching Materials On Students’ Creativity. University of Tartu, Estonian Ministery of Education. Ismail, I., Permanasari, A & Setiawan, W. (2016). STEM Virtual Lab : An Alternative Practical Media to Enhance Students Scientific Literacy. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(2), 239-246. Jho, H., Yoon, H.G. & Kim. K. (2014). The Relationship of Science Knowledge, Attitude and Decision Making on Socio-scientific Issues: The Case Study of Students’ Debates on a Nuclear Power Plant in Korea. Science and Education, 23, 1131–1151. Khaeroningtyas, N., Permanasari, A & Hamidah, I. (2016). Stem Learning in Material of Temperature and Its Change to Improve Scientific Literacy of Junior High School. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(1), 94-100. Pehmer, A.K., Gröschner, A & Seidel, T. (2015). How Teacher Professional Development Regarding Classroom Dialogue Affects Students’ HigherOrder Learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 47, 108-119. Putra, M.I.S., Widodo, W & Jatmiko, B. (2016). The Development of Guided Inquiry Science