Repository Universitas Pakuan

Detail Karya Ilmiah Dosen

Tri Sundari, Indarini Dwi Pursitasari, Leny Heliawati

Judul : PEMBELAJARAN INKUIRI TERBIMBING BERBASIS PRAKTIKUM PADA TOPIK LAJU REAKSI
Abstrak :

This study aims to investigate the influence of learning guided inquiry based on practicum on the rate of reaction to
mastery of concepts and students' scientific attitudes. The research was conducted in one of the private high schools in Bogor City class XI IPA in the academic year 2016/2017. The population was 192 students with the total sample of 60 students divided into 31 students following the guided inquiry based learning and 29 students followed the traditional learning. The data collection is done through the test of mastery of the concept of reaction rate and the questionnaire of scientific attitude with Likert scale. Data were analyzed statistically descriptive and inferential using independent t-test. The results showed that there was a significant difference between the mastery of students 'concepts that followed the guided inquiry learning based on practice (average 80.7) and the mastery of students' concepts following traditional learning (average 74.8). Students 'scientific attitudes also showed significant differences between students who followed learning with guided inquiry based on practice (average 3.2) and students' scientific attitudes following traditional learning (average 2.2). Thus it can be concluded that guided inquiry learning based on practice can improve the mastery of students' scientific concepts and attitudes.

Tahun : 2017 Media Publikasi : Jurnal Nasional Blm Akreditasi
Kategori : Jurnal No/Vol/Tahun : 2 / 6 / 2017
ISSN/ISBN : 2089-1776
PTN/S : Universitas Pakuan Program Studi : KIMIA
Bibliography :

  1. Abdelraheem, A. Y. & Asan, A. 2006. The Effectiveness of Inquiry-Based Technology Enhanced Collaborative Learning Environment. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 2(2), 65-87.
  2. Aksela, M. & Boström, M. 2012. Supporting Students’ Interest through Inquiry-Based Learning in the Context of Fuel Cells. Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE). 2(3): 53-61
  3. Aktamis, H & Acar, E. 2010. The Effect of “Laboratory Practices in science teaching” Course on Development of Prospective science Teachers’ Self-Regulation Skills. . Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences: 5549–5553
  4. Ariesta, R. & Supartono. 2011. Pengembangan Perangkat Perkuliahan Kegiatan Laboratorium Fisika Dasar II Berbasis Inkuiri Terbimbing. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia. 7: 62-68
  5. Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan. 2006. Panduan Umum KTSP. Kemendikbud
  6. Bayram, Oskay, Erdem, & Ozgur. 2013. Effect of inquiry based learning method on students’ Motivation. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 106: 988–996.
  7. Chen, C,T & She, H.C. 2014. The Effectiveness of Scientific Inquiry with/without Integration of Scientific Reasoning.International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education.
  8. Cooper, M. M. & Kerns, T. S. (2006). “Changing the Laboratoty: Effects of a Laboratory Course on Students’ Attititudes and Perception”. Journal of Chemical Education. 83, (9), 1356-1361.
  9. Gormally, C., Brickman, P., Hallar, B., & Armstrong, N. 2009. Effects of Inquiry-based Learning on Students’ Science Literacy Skills and Confidence. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. 3(2): 1-22
  10. Hofstein, A. & Lunetta, V. N. 2003. The Laboratory in Science Education: Foundations for the Twenty-First Century. New York: Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
  11. Kelly, O. & Finlayson, O. (2008). “A Hurdle Too High? Students’ Experience of a PBL Laboratory Module”. Chemistry Education Research and Practice., 10, 42–52.
  12. Kholifudin, M. Y. 2012. Pembelajaran Fisika dengan Inkuiri Terbimbing Melalui Metode Eksperimen dan Demonstrasi Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar Siswa.  Ilmiah XXVI HFI Jateng & DIY, Purworejo 14 April 2012.
  13. Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J. & Century, J. 2010. Inquiry-Based Science Instruction – What Is It and Does it Matter? Results from a Research Synthesis Year 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47 (4): 474-496.
  14. Orgill, M. & Sutherland, A. (2008). “Undergraduate Chemistry Students’ Perception of and Misconception about Buffers and Problem Buffers”. Chemical Education Reserch and Practice. 9, 131-143.
  15. Pursitasari, I. D. (2009). “Peningkatan Aktivitas dan Pemahaman Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Kimia melalui Pendekatan Kontekstual”. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan. 16. (3): 172-177
  16. Pursitasari, I., & Aminah, S. 2010. Pengembangan Buku Ajar Berorientasi CTL untuk Meningkatkan Efektivitas Pembelajaran Kimia di SMA kota Palu. Laporan Penelitian Hibah Bersaing: Palu, tidak dipublikasikan
  17. Sarwi, Sutardi, & Prayitno, W. W. 2016. Implementasi Pembelajaran Fisika Guided Inquiry untuk Meningkatkan Penguasaan Konsep dan Pengembangan Karakter Konservasi Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia 12 (1): 1-7
  18. Sheppard, K. (2006). “High School Students’ Understanding of Titrations and Related Acid-
    Base Phenomena”. Chemical Education of Research and Practice, 7, (1), 32-45.
  19. Tarhan, L. & Sesen.2010. Investigation the effectiveness of laboratory works related to “acid and bases” on learning achievements and attitudes toward laboratory. International Journal Science Education. Procedia Social and BehavioralSciences 2: 2631–2636
  20. Varma, K. 2014. Supporting Scientific Experiments and Reasoning in Young Elementary School Students. Journal of science Education and Technology. 23: 381–397.

URL : https://journal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jpps/article/viewFile/1227/1394

 

Document

 
back