Judul | : | Attribut Selection of Indonesian Telematic Services MSMEs Assisstance Feasibility, using AHP | |||
Abstrak | : | The assistance had not absorbed optimally yet for telematics MSMEs. One of the reasons was the data of telematics MSME which still separated in the several institutions. This research aimed to selection of assistance feasibility attributes using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) based on National Socio-Economic Survey (Susenas) data. This data attributes conformed to the criteria of assistance feasibility which was implemented among by Ministry of Cooperative, Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs), and related institutions. The attributes involved the characteristic of technology, economics, human resources, partnerships, obstacles, prospect and other common conditions. The process of data preparation was needed involving cleaning, discretization, description and transformation of data. The AHP technique aimed to produce rankings and the value of attributes. The finding of this research showed that start-up essence and technology factors became the crucial attributes in the feasibility assessment. The other factors were the economy, human resources, partnerships and development planning. The findings of this research had given the new innovations; in addition of the scope of related substance Telematics Service MSMEs which was still studied limitedly, and the selection technique of assessment feasibility attributes based on Susenas data.
Keywords
Analitycal Hierarchi Process; Preparation; Telematics Services; Susenas |
|||
Tahun | : | 2015 | Media Publikasi | : | Jurnal Nasional Terakreditasi B |
Kategori | : | Jurnal | No/Vol/Tahun | : | 2 / 8 / 2015 |
ISSN/ISBN | : | 2301– 6914 | |||
PTN/S | : | Universitas Pakuan | Program Studi | : | ILMU KOMPUTER |
Bibliography | : | REFERENCES [1] Tosida ET, Maryana S, Thaheer H. The Potencies of Indonesian Telematic Services Enterprises Group. National Conference of Information, Communicatin & Management Proceeding. Bina Darma University, Palembang, August, 2014.
[2] Deputy of Finance. Policy Development and Empowerment Program for Cooperation SME’s in Financing Sector. Ministry of Cooperation and SME’s. 2014.
[3] Sadeghi A, Azar A, Rad RS. Developing a fuzzy group AHP model for prioritizing the factors affecting success of High-Tech SME’s in Iran : A case study. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Scieces 62 (2012) 957-961. Elsevier, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.163. [4] Erdil A, Erbiyik H. Selection Strategy via Analitic Hierarchy Process : An Application for a Small Enterprise in Milk Sector. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 195 (2015) 2618-2628.
Elsevier,doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.463.
[5] Kumar S, Luthra S, Haleem A, Mangla SK, Garg D. International Strategic Management Review 3 (2015) 24-42. Journal http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ism. 2015.09.001. [6] Sohn SY, MoonTH, Kim S. Improved Technology Scoring Model for Credit Guarantee Fund. Expert with Application 28 (2005) 327-331. Elsevier.
[7] Sohn SY, KimS, Moon TH. 2007. Predicting the Financial Performance Index of Technology Fund for SME using Structural Equaton Model. J. Expert with Application 32 (2007) 890-898. Elsevier.
[8] Kim HS, Sohn SY. Support Vector Machines for Default Prediction of SMEs Based on Technology Credit. European Journal of Operational Research 201 (2010) 838-846. Elsevier.
[9] Sohn SY, Kim JW. Decision Tree-based Technology Credit Scoring for Strart-Up Firms : Korean Case. J. Expert Systems with Applications 39 (2012) 4007-40112. Elsevier.
[10] McGuirk H, Lenihan H, Hart M.. Measuring the Impact of Innovation Human Capital on Small Firms Propensity to Innovative. J. Research Policy 44 (2015) : 965-976. Elsevier.
[11] Marcelino-Sadaba S., Perez-Ezcurdia A, Lazcano AME, Villanieva P. 2014. Project risk Management Methodology for Small Firms. International J. of Project Management 32 (2014) 327-340. Elsevier.
[12] Kemenkominfo. Indicators Survey Handbook on Access and Use of ICT in Households. 2015.
[13]McGuirk H, Lenihan H, Hart M. Measuring the Impact of Innovation Human Capital on Small Firms Propensity to Innovative. Research Policy 44 (2015) : 965-976. Elsevier.
[14] Wawan D, Prasetio EA, Ratnaningyas S, Herliana S, Cherudin R, Aina Qorri, Bayuningrat RH, Rachmawaty E. Moderating Effect of Cluster on Firms Innovation Capability and Business Performance : A Conceptual Framework. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Science 65 (2012) 867-872. Elsevier.
[15] Marimin dan Magfiroh. Application Techniques Decision making in Supply Chain Management. IPB Press Bogor. 2011.
[16] Lee H, Lee S, Byungun Y. 2011. Technology Clustering Based on Evolutionary Patterns : The Case of Information and Communications Technologies.J. Technological Fore- casting & Social Change, Vol. 78. (2011) 953-967. Elsevier.
[17] Hafsah MJ. The Effort of SME’s Development. Infokop Journal, No. 25, Tahun XX, 2004. Smecda..ejournal.unsri. ac.id/index.php/jsi/article/.../718/260.
[18] Bapeda Banyuwangi. Role of Cooperatives in supporting the develop- ment and strengthening of SMEs in Banyuwangi Regency. 2013. http:// www.bps.go.id/index.php/publikasi/1083.
[19] Afiah NN. The Role of Entrepreneurship in Strengthening Indonesian SME’s to Facing the Global Financial Crisis. Paper presented at Research Day, Accounting Development Centre, Department of Accounting, Padjadjaran University. 2009.https://scholar.google.co.id/scholar?
[20] Ediraras DT. Accounting and SME’s Performance. Economic Business Journal, No. 2, Vol. 15, August 2010. ejournal.gunadarma.ac.id/index.php/ekbis /article/view/331/272.
[21]Soenarso Wisnu S, Nugraha D, Listyaningrum E. Development of Science and Technology Park (STP) in Indonesia to Support Innovation-Based Regional Economy: Concept and Early Stage Development. World Technopolis Review
(WTR). Volume 2, Issue 1, 2013,pp.32- 42.World Technopolis Association. DOI : 10.7165/wtr2013. 2.1.32.
[22] Ju Y, Jeon SY, Sohn SY. Behavioral technology credit scoring model with time-dependent covariates for stress test.
European Journal of Operation Research, 242 (2015) 910-919. Elsevier. http://dx.doi.org/10/1016/j.ejor.2014.10.0 54. |
|||
URL | : |