Indarti Komala Dewi, Umar Mansyur, Vega Vania

Judul	:	Performance of Sidewalk in Suryakancana Cultural Heritage Area Bogor City
Abstrak	:	Abstract City sidewalks have an important function in serving the daily movement of residents and have a direct impact on the quality of life, culture, business, and place identity. Suryakancana is a cultural heritage area (Chinatown) that also serves as a tourist destination and business area with a fairly high concentration of pedestrians. Therefore, the comfort of the sidewalk is very important for this heritage area. The study aims to assess the sidewalk’s Walkability Index (WI), pedestrian satisfaction, pedestrian needs index, and sidewalks performance. The analysis uses the Global Walkability Index. The sidewalk walkability index is moderately walkable (61.13), pedestrian satisfaction index is quite satisfied (55.60), and pedestrian needs index is highly needed (94.19). This indicates that the current performance of the Suryakan-cana sidewalks has not met pedestrians’ expectations. To increase visitor’s mobility, the sidewalk’s performance should be improved, especially on variables recorded as high priority. Three of eight variables need attention: obstruction, infrastructure for people with disability, and availability of crossing. Keywords: Culture ·Heritage ·Mobility ·Sidewalk ·Walkability
Tahun	:	2023	Media Publikasi	:	Seminar Internasional
Kategori	:	Prosiding	No/Vol/Tahun	:	- / 334 / 2023
ISSN/ISBN	:	e-ISSN: 2615-3750 ; p-ISSN: 2615-3769
PTN/S	:	Universitas Pakuan	Program Studi	:	PERENCANAAN WILAYAH & KOTA
Bibliography	:	1.UCLG (2017) Revitalizing cultural heritage a comprehensive urban plan to revitalize Kota Tua in Jakarta. UCLG Peer Learning 2.Ghani NA, Shimizu T, Mokhtar S (2015) Assessment of pedestrian facilities in Malacca world heritage site Malaysia using P-index method. J East Asia Soc Transp Stud 11:1535–1554 3.Agustin IW (2017) Application of the walkability concept in the area of Malang city square. J City Dev 5(1):45–57 4.Sondakh AFP (2017) Methods for assessing the walkability of settlements in urban a systematic literature review. J Rev Urban Arch Stud 15(1):1–12 5.Kurniawati W, Ananta A (2020) Feasibility analysis of walking and factors affecting interest in walking in Jakarta. J Econ Policy 16(1):1–30 6.Muhaemin AB (2019) Walkability: perspective from a local neighborhood in Bandar Lampung. Indonesia J Innov Dev Kelitbangan 7(1):1–14 7.Rahmatiani V, Kameswara B (2021) Walkability and pedestrian satisfaction levels in the Jatinangor educational area and Sudirman trade area. J Tata Loka 23(3):438–451 8.Babu RS, Tadepalli S (2016) Assessing the needs of pedestrian facilities at Tiruchirappalli, India. J Int Malay World Civilis 4(2):87–90 9.Hafnizar Y, Izziah I, Saleh SM (2017) The influence of convenience on the application of the Walkable concept in the area old city center. J Civ Eng, Syiah Kuala Univ 1(1):271–284 10.Rafiemanzelat R, Emadi MI, Kamali AJ (2017) City sustainability: the influence of walkability on built environments. Transp Res Procedia 24:97–104 11.Erlangga D, Handayani D, Syafi’i S (2020) The concept of walkability index and handling of pedestrian facilities in urban road areas in Indonesia. J Civ Eng Res 4(1):12–22 12.Agradiana P (2020) Pedestrian preference level and walkability of road corridors in old city Jakarta. MARKA. J Sci Res 3(2):68–82 13.Darmawan AM, Rahmi DH (2021) Quality of walkability in Peunayong, Banda Aceh. Built Environ Stud 2(2):43–50 14.Wowor VD, Kumurur VA, Lefrandt LI (2019) Urban walkability in Manado city (case study: sub district Mapanget). J Spasial 6(1):178–186 15.Sari AM, Sari DF, Wibawani S (2020) Application of the concept of walkability in supporting the city of Surabaya as a productive and sustainable Metropolitan city. J Public Adm Res 2(3):288–303 16.Muttaqin ZM, Khodizah S (2021) Walkability index for commercial zone through sidewalk area segmentation in Pekanbaru. J Transp Logist 8(2):187–195 17.Nugroho RA, Rusnabilah A (2022) The walkability index value of pedestrians in the trade and service area of Samarinda city. J Reksabumi 1(1):1–16 18.Nurmayadi D, Sholahudin F (2022) Improvement of walkbility quality on Jalan H.Z. Mustofa Tasikmalaya city. J Arch Arcade 1(6):68–73 19.Siregar MRA, Jayawinangun R (2020) Spatial communication of historical sites to strengthen the transformation of the city as a heritage city. J Represent 6(2):31–41 20.Triharto W, Hidayat R, Firman R (2018) Study of Bogor heritage city planning. J Arch Lakar 1(1):81–90 21.Rosalisa S, Gunadi MA, Rusli M (2015) The marketing strategy of the Suryakancana Bogor Chinatown as a cultural tourism destination. J Tour Destin Attract 3(1):20–35 22.Hasibuan MSR, Syahadat RM, Nuraini Arifin NHS (2016) The planning of Jalan Surya Kencana–Siliwangi as a space of cultural interpretation in the Chinatown area of Bogor City. J Buana Sains 16(1):71–82 23.Meidatuzzahra D (2019) Application of accidental sampling to determine the prevalence of injectable contraceptive acceptors to the menstrual cycle. J Avesina 13(1):9–23 24.Safitri R, Amelia R (2019) Walkability index in commercial area of Pangkalpinang city. J Infrastruct 5(2):79–83
URL	: