Bibliography |
: |
REFERENCES
Acikalin, F. S. (2013). Middle school students’ conceptions
of
environmental issues. International
Journal of New Trends in Art, Sports & Science
Education. 2(4): 23-27
Alfieri, L., Brooks, P.J. & Aldrich, J.N. (2010). Does
Discovery-Based Instruction Enhance Learning?.
Journal of educational Psycology. (103)1:118.
Alwasilah, A.C. (2012). Pokoknya Rekayasa Literasi.
Bandung: Kiblat.
Ardianto, D dan Rubini, B. (2016). Komparasi Literasi
Sains
Siswa
Pada
Pembelajaran
IPA
Terpadu
dengan
Model Guided Discovery
dan Problem
Based
Learning.
Jurnal
Pendidikan
IPA
Indonesia.
Balitbang. (2012). Survei Internasional PISA. Jakarta:
Pusat Penelitian Pendidikan Balitbag Kemendikbud.
Brickman, P., Gormally, C., Armstrong N dan Hallar,
B. (2009). Effects of Inquiry-Based Learning
on Students’science Literacy Skills dnd Confidence.
International
Journal
for the Scholarship
of
Teaching and Learning. (3)2
Chen, C. T dan She, H. C. (2014). The Effectiveness
of Scientific Inquiry with/ without Integration
of Scientific Reasoning. International Journal of
Science and Mathematics Education.
Fraenkel, J.R., Wallen, N.E. dan Hyun, H.H. (2012).
How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education.
New York: McGraw-Hill.
Groves, F.H dan Pugh, A.F. (1999). Elementary PreService
Teacher
Perceptions
of
the Greenhouse
Effect. Journal of Science Education & Technology.
9: 75-81
Kahlid, T. (2011). Pre-service Teacher’s Misconceptoins
Regarding
Three Environmental
Issues.
Canadian
Journal
of
Environmental Educations. 6:
102-120
Koulaidis, V & Christidou, V. (1999). Model of Students’
Thinking
Concerning
the Greenhouse
Effect
and
Teaching
Implementations.
Science
Education.
83(5): 559-576
Marta, Febrian Andi. 2010. Analisis Literasi Sains
Siswa SMP dalam Pembelajaran IPA Terpadu
pada Tema Efek Rumah Kaca. Tesis. Bandung:
FPMIPA Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Nbina, J. B. (2013). The Relative Effectiveness of
Guided Discovery and Demonstration Teaching
Methods on Achievement
of
Chemistry
Students
of
Different levels of Scientific Literacy.
Journal
of
Research in Education and Society.
(4)1
Osborne, J., et al. (2001). Enhancing the quality of argument
in
school
science.
School
Science Review.
83
(301)
Rebich, S dan Gautier, C. (2005). Concept Mapping
to Reveal Prior Knowledge and Conceptual
Change in a Mock Summit Course on Global
Climate Change. Journal of Geoscience Education.
53(4): 355-365
Rubini,B dan Ardianto, D. (2014). Analisis Literasi
Sains Sisiwa di Kota Bogor. Laporan Penelitian.
Bogor: Pascasarjana Universitas Pakuan
Rustaman, N.Y. (2003). Literasi Sains Anak Indonesia
2000 dan 2003. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan
Indonesia.
Sadler, T.D dan Zeidler, D.L. (2009). Scientific Literacy,
PISA,
dan Socioscientific Discourse:
Asessment
for
Progressive
Aims
of
Science Education.
Journal
of
science Teaching.1-13
Sadler, T.D dan Zeidler, D.L. (2005). The significance
of content knowledge for informal reasoning
regarding response to a sosiocientific issues:
Applying genetics knowledge to to genentic
engineering issues. Journal of Science Education.
89(1): 71-93
Soobard, R dan Rannikmae, M. (2011). Assessing
student’s level of scientific literacy using interdisciplinary
scenarios.
Science
Education International.
22 (2): 133-144
Spiropolou, D., Antonakaki, T., Kontaxaki, S & Bouras,
S.
(2007). Primary
Teachers’
Literacy and
Attitudes
on
Education
for Sustainable
Development.
Journal
of
Science Education Technology.
16: 443-450
Varma, K. (2014). Supporting Scientific Experimentation
and
Reasoning
in
Young
Elementary
School
Students.
Journal
of
Science Education
and Technology. 23: 381–397.
Vosniadou, S dan Ioannides, C. (1998). From conceptual
development
to science
education:
a
psy-
chological point of view. International Journal of
Science Education. 20(10): 1213-1230
Yang, F.Y. & Tsai, C.C. (2010). Reasoning about sci-
ence-related uncertain issues and epistemological
perspectives
among children.
Instructional
Science.
38: 325–354.
|