Repository Universitas Pakuan

Detail Karya Ilmiah Dosen

Indarini Dwi Pursitasari

Judul : IDENTIFY SCIENTIFIC LITERACY FROM THE SCIENCE TEACHERS’ PERSPECTIVE
Abstrak :

ABSTRACT
Scientific literacy is considered as a benchmark of high and low quality of  science education in a country. This
study aims to identify the scientific literacy of  teachers and learning science relation to the issues from the perspective
of
 a science teacher. This descriptive study involved 25 science teachers who are members of MGMP
IPA in Bogor. The instrument used in this study consisted of  scientific literacy tests and interviews. The results
showed that 20% of  teachers have scientific literacy ability in the low category, 65% in the moderate category and
15% in the high category. The problems of teaching science based on teacher perspective are 1. having difficulty
to teach Integrated Science; 2. having limited knowledge related to learning models of Integrated Science; 3.
lack of  motivation in teaching integrated science consistently. The results of  these studies form the basis that the
professional trainings for junior high science teacher need to be conducted in a sustainable manner and related
with the needs of their proficiency.

Tahun : 2016 Media Publikasi : jurnal internasional
Kategori : Jurnal No/Vol/Tahun : 2 / 5 / 2016
ISSN/ISBN : 2339-1286
PTN/S : universitas pakuan Program Studi : PENDIDIKAN ILMU PENGETAHUAN ALAM
Bibliography :

REFERENCES
Acikalin, F. S. (2013). Middle school students’ conceptions
of
 environmental issues. International
Journal of  New Trends in Art, Sports & Science
Education. 2(4): 23-27
Alfieri, L., Brooks, P.J. & Aldrich, J.N. (2010). Does
Discovery-Based Instruction Enhance Learning?.

Journal of  educational Psycology. (103)1:118.
Alwasilah, A.C. (2012). Pokoknya Rekayasa Literasi.
Bandung: Kiblat.
Ardianto, D dan Rubini, B. (2016).  Komparasi Literasi
Sains
Siswa
Pada
Pembelajaran
IPA
Terpadu

dengan
Model Guided Discovery
dan Problem
Based
Learning.
Jurnal
Pendidikan
IPA
Indonesia.
Balitbang. (2012). Survei Internasional PISA. Jakarta:
Pusat Penelitian Pendidikan Balitbag Kemendikbud.
Brickman, P., Gormally, C., Armstrong N dan Hallar,
B. (2009). Effects of  Inquiry-Based Learning
on Students’science Literacy Skills dnd Confidence.
International
Journal
for the Scholarship
of

Teaching and Learning. (3)2
Chen, C. T dan She, H. C. (2014). The Effectiveness
of  Scientific Inquiry with/ without Integration
of  Scientific Reasoning. International Journal of
Science and Mathematics Education.
Fraenkel, J.R., Wallen, N.E. dan Hyun, H.H. (2012).
How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education.
New York: McGraw-Hill.
Groves, F.H dan Pugh, A.F. (1999). Elementary PreService
Teacher
Perceptions
of
 the Greenhouse
Effect. Journal of  Science Education & Technology.
9: 75-81
Kahlid, T. (2011). Pre-service Teacher’s Misconceptoins
Regarding
Three Environmental
Issues.

Canadian
Journal
of
 Environmental Educations. 6:
102-120
Koulaidis, V & Christidou, V. (1999). Model of Students’
Thinking
Concerning
the Greenhouse
Effect
and
Teaching
Implementations.
Science

Education.
83(5): 559-576
Marta, Febrian Andi. 2010. Analisis Literasi Sains
Siswa SMP dalam Pembelajaran IPA Terpadu
pada Tema Efek Rumah Kaca. Tesis. Bandung:

FPMIPA Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Nbina, J. B. (2013). The Relative Effectiveness of  
Guided Discovery and Demonstration Teaching
Methods on Achievement
of
Chemistry

Students
of
 Different levels of  Scientific Literacy.
Journal
of
 Research in Education and Society.
(4)1
Osborne, J., et al. (2001). Enhancing the quality of  argument
in
school
science.
School
Science Review.

83
(301)
Rebich, S dan Gautier, C. (2005). Concept Mapping
to Reveal Prior Knowledge and Conceptual
Change in a Mock Summit Course on Global
Climate Change. Journal of  Geoscience Education.
53(4): 355-365
Rubini,B dan Ardianto, D. (2014). Analisis Literasi
Sains Sisiwa di Kota Bogor. Laporan Penelitian.
Bogor: Pascasarjana Universitas Pakuan
Rustaman, N.Y. (2003). Literasi Sains Anak Indonesia
2000 dan 2003. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan
Indonesia.
Sadler, T.D dan Zeidler, D.L. (2009). Scientific Literacy,
PISA,
dan Socioscientific Discourse:
Asessment
for
Progressive
Aims
of
 Science Education.
Journal
of
 science Teaching.1-13
Sadler, T.D dan Zeidler, D.L. (2005). The significance
of  content knowledge for informal reasoning
regarding response to a sosiocientific issues:
Applying genetics knowledge to to genentic
engineering issues. Journal of  Science Education.
89(1): 71-93
Soobard, R dan Rannikmae, M. (2011). Assessing
student’s level of  scientific literacy using interdisciplinary
scenarios.
Science
Education International.
22 (2): 133-144
Spiropolou, D., Antonakaki, T., Kontaxaki, S & Bouras,
S.
(2007). Primary
Teachers’
Literacy and
Attitudes
on
Education
for Sustainable
Development.
Journal
of
 Science Education Technology.
16: 443-450
Varma, K. (2014). Supporting Scientific Experimentation
and
Reasoning
in
Young
Elementary

School
Students.
Journal
of
 Science Education
and Technology. 23: 381–397.
Vosniadou, S dan Ioannides, C. (1998). From conceptual
development
to science
education:
a
psy-
chological point of  view. International Journal of  
Science Education. 20(10): 1213-1230
Yang, F.Y. & Tsai, C.C. (2010). Reasoning about sci-
ence-related uncertain issues and epistemological
perspectives
among children.
Instructional

Science.
38: 325–354.

URL : http://journal.unnes.ac.id/index.php/jpii

 

Document

 
back