Repository Universitas Pakuan

Detail Karya Ilmiah Dosen

Lita Karlitasari, Dini Suhartini

Judul : Comparison of simple additive weighting (SAW) and composite performance index (CPI) methods in employee remuneration determination
Abstrak :

The process of determining the employee remuneration for PT Sepatu Mas Idaman currently are still using Microsoft Excel-based spreadsheet where in the spreadsheet there is the value of criterias that must be calculated for every employee. This can give the effect of doubt during the assesment process, therefore resulting in the process to take much longer time. The process of employee remuneration determination is conducted by the assesment team based on some criterias that have been predetermined. The criteria used in the assessment process are namely the ability to work, human relations, job responsibility, discipline, creativity, work, achievement of targets, and absence. To ease the determination of employee remuneration to be more efficient and effective, the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method is used. SAW method can help in decision making for a certain case, and the calculation that generates the greatest value will be chosen as the best alternative. Other than SAW, also by using another method was the CPI method which is one of the calculating method in decision making based on performance index. Where SAW method was more faster by 89-93% compared to CPI method. Therefore it is expected that this application can be an evaluation material for the need of training and development for employee performances to be more optimal.

Tahun : 2017 Media Publikasi : Prosiding
Kategori : Prosiding No/Vol/Tahun : 1 / 166 / 2017
ISSN/ISBN : 10/1088/1757-899X/166/1/012020
PTN/S : Universitas Pakuan Program Studi : ILMU KOMPUTER
Bibliography :

  1. A Hidayat, H Mustafidah, and A Suyadi. 2015. Penerapan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (Saw) Untuk Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Kinerja Dosen Di Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto. Prosiding SENATEK 2015. Technique Faculty. Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto. Purwokerto. ISBN 978-602-14355-0 -2, pp. 367-374.
  2. A Memariania, A Aminib and A Alinezhadc. 2009. Sensitivity Analysis of Simple Additive Weighting Method (SAW): The Results of Change in the Weight of One Attribute on the Final Ranking of Alternatives. Journal of Optomization in Industrial Engineering. Article 2. Volume 2. Issue 4. Page 13-18.
  3. G S Pandian, N Jawahar, and SP Nachiappan. 2013. Composite Performance Index for Sustainability. IOSR Journal of Environmental Science, Toxicology and Food Technology (IOSR-JESTFT) e-ISSN: 2319-2402, p- ISSN: 2319-2399.Volume 3, Issue 1. PP 91-102.
  4. Turban, Efrain, Aronson, and Jay. 2001. Decision Support System and Intelligent System, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.

[5]Valensia. 2012. Sistem Pendukung Keputusan penilaian Kinerja Karyawan Dengan Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW).

URL : http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1757-899X/166/1/012020/pdf

 

Document

 
back