Pendi Kurniawan, Sri Setyaningsih, Thamrin Abdullah, M. Entang, MuhamadRiyad, Munaki

Judul	:	PSYCHOLOGY AND EDUCATION (2022) 59(2): 234-242ISSN: 1553-6939234www.psychologyandeducation.netImproving The Performance Of School Heads Through Strengthening Commitments To Organizations, Emotional Intelligence, And Achievement Motivation (Empirical Study Using Correlational Approach And Sitorem Analysis On Principals Of Private Junior High Schools In Bekasi)
Abstrak	:	School success is part of the contribution of the principal as a leader who has influence, power and encouragement to his subordinates. The success of the principal has a significant influence on the performance of teachers and employees. High school principal's performance is demonstrated by the achievement of school programs that are in accordance with the specified targets and goals. The principal will evaluate the performance that has been achieved and what has not been achieved, meaning that the principal always engages the teacher in various matters especially those relating to school progress.Based on the background of the problems above, the purpose of this study is to make efforts to improve the performance of the principal by conducting research on related variables. The related variables are commitment to organization, emotional intelligence and achievement motivation.This research is a correlational study with SITOREM analysis to determine whether the variable commitment to the organization, emotional intelligence and achievement motivation can improve the performance of school principals. The SITOREM method is used to determine the order of priorities and recommendations for improvements that need to be made.The population of the study was 247 principals of Private Middle Schools in Bekasi Regency. The research sample was 153 respondents who were determined by the Slovin formula. Sampling is done by proportional random.The results of quantitative research found that all independent variables can improve the performance of school principals. According to the order of the strength of the strongest correlations namely emotional intelligence (ryx2)2= 0.874, achievement motivation (ryx3)2= 0.869, and commitment to the organization (ryx1)2= 0.804.SITOREM Analysis Results show that the principal's performance component, commitment to the organization, emotional intelligence and achievement motivation. Components of achievement motivation that require improvement are: (1) establishing relationships with relationships, (2) increasing self-esteem and special abilities, and (3) being able to control and influence others. While the components that need to be maintained include: Responsible (4.29), Engagement (4.12), Objectives (4.05), Working (4.21), Desire (4.05), Responsible (4.29) ), Acting (4,09), Emotions of others (4,05), Feelings (4,05), Controlling (4,04), Self-emotions (4,18), Relationships (4,26), Managing (4 , 04), Work plan (4.11), Responsibility (4.13), Target (4.12), Work quantity (4.06), work quality (4.09), work efficiency (4.19), cost effectiveness (4.06), time efficiency (4.07), and the need for supervision (4.10).
Tahun	:	2022	Media Publikasi	:	Jurnal Internasional
Kategori	:	Jurnal	No/Vol/Tahun	:	NO. 2 / VOL. 59 / 2022
ISSN/ISBN	:	ISSN: 1553-6939
PTN/S	:	universitas Pakuan	Program Studi	:	MANAJEMEN PENDIDIKAN
Bibliography	:	Alder, Harry. Boost Your Intelligence: Pacu EQ dan IQ Anda (Jakarta: Ertangga, 2007).Anderson, Neil. Handbook of Industrial: WorkandOrganizationPsychology, Vol. 1, (London: Sage PublicationsLtd, 2010). Armstrong, Michael.Performance Management(India: Kogan Page, 2007).Bernardin, John, H. and E.A. Russel Human Resource Management, An Experiential Approach. (Singapore:Mac Graw Hill Book Co., 2009).Colquitt, Jason A. Lepine, Jeffery A. dan Michael J. Wesson. Organizational Behavior: Improving Performance and Commitment in the Workplace.(New York: McGraw-Hill, 2009).Cooper, Rober K. and Sawaf, Ayman. Executive EQ: Emotional Intelligence in Leadership 2nd Organisation, Alih Bahasa Alex Tri Kantjono Widodo (Jakarta: GramediaPustakaUtama, 2007).George, Jennifer M. and Jones, Gareth R. Understanding and Managing Organizational Behavior. (New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc. 2005). Gibson, James L., John M. Ivancevich, James H. Donelly Jr., Robert Konopaske. Organizational: Behavior, Structure, Processes. (New York: McGraw-Hill, Irwin. 2009).Greenberg, Jerald dan Baron, Robert A. Behavior in Organizations.(New Jersey: Prentice-Pl, 2007).Griffin, Ricky W.&Moorhead, Gregory. Organizational Behavior. (New York: HoongtonMiffin Company Boston, 2007).Jex Steve M. Organizational Psychology, A Scientist-Practitioner Approach(New York:John Wiley, 2002). Stein, Steven J. & Book, Howard E. Ledakan EQ: 15 PrinsipDasarKecerdasanEmosionalihSukses(Bandung: Kaifa, 2008).Stollz, Paul G. Adversity Quotient: Terjemahan; T Hermaya. (Jakarta: Grasindo. 2007). Stoner, James F. Manajemen. Terj. AlfonsusSirait. (Jakarta: Erlangga, 2004).Wagner, John A. and John R. Hollenbeck. Organizational Behavior: Securing Competitive Advantage (New York: South-Western, Thomson Learning,2005).
URL	:	http://psychologyandeducation.net/pae/index.php/pae/article/view/7268