The history of commercial agriculture was developed due to the growth of agricultural area within
the urban fringe to support urban social activities since the green revolution era. The agriculture history also proves
that the urban fringe are used to be the agriculture center as Von Thune theory stated. However, the massive
urbanization has changed the agriculture lands to suburban area as part of urban development. Therefore, how far
the development of the urban will affect the agriculture lands and its support for urban food self-sufficiency has to
be studied beforehand. This study aims to assess the impact of urban development to the nearby agriculture sector.
In this case, remote sensing data may assist to provide the spatial information of the trend and the area of agriculture
change nearby. The method for this study was employing change detection method for remote sensing data to assess
the land use change of the suburban area. The EOP (effect on Production) method was also employed to assess the
economic loss of the agriculture area nearby the urban and so does the simple statistic data analysis. Using the
Jakarta as the study area, the study indicates that the remote sensing data can be used for food security management
analysis and assess the impact of agricultural land conversion. The Agricultural land conversion may have an impact
in the availability of the food stock, increasing the monetary for imported food, decreasing the income of local
farmers, increasing the labor needs in other sectors rather ten agriculture and decreasing the passion of people to
work in the agriculture sectors.
Andreas, H. 2011. Penurunan tanah di DKI Jakarta. Hasil Pengukuran dan Evaluasi Elevasi oleh Dinas Perindustrian
dan Energi DKI Jakarta., Jakarta: Dinas Perindustrian dan Energi DKI Jakarta.
BIG. 2013. BIG head decree number 15 year 2013 about Indonesian Geodetic Reference System 2013. Decree,
de Min, E. 2003. GM81 a FORTRAN program for calculating geoid from global model. Unpublished, Delft: TU
Heiskanen, WA and Moritz, H. 1967. Physical geodesy. California: W. H. Freeman.
Hofmann-Wellenhof, B., and Moritz H. 2005. Physical Geodesy. 2nd. Wien: Springer.
Prijatna, K. 2010. Pengembangan Model Pengkombinasian Data Gaya berat dengan Model Geopotensial Global
untuk Penentuan Geoid Regional Wilayah Indonesia. Bandung: Institut Teknologi Bandung.
Ramdani, D.; Priyatna, K.; Andreas, H. 2014. "Global Geopotential Model Evaluation for geoid calculation in
Jakarta." Jurnal Ilmiah Geomatika 121-128.
Ries, J.C.; Bettadpur, S.; Poole, S.; Richter, T. August 2011. Mean Background Gravity Fields for GRACE
Processing. Austin, TX: GRACE Science Team Meeting, 8â€10.
Rummel, R. 1992. Fysishe Geodesi I (Physical Geodesy I). Delft: TU Delft.
Schwarz, K. P., M. G. Sideris, and R. Forsberg, 1990. "The use of FFT techniques in physical geodesy." Geophysical
Journal International 485-514.
Sideris, MG. 2013. "Geoid determination by FFT techniques." In Geoid Determination: theory and method, by F
Sansò and MG Sideris, 453-516. Berlin Heidelberg, Springer.
Tscherning, C.C.; Forsberg, R.; Knudsen, P. May 1992. "The GRAVSOFT package for geoid determination." Edited
by Petr Holota. 1. Continental Workshop on the Geoid in Europe: Towards a Precise Pan-european Reference
Geoid for the Nineties. Prague: Research institute of geodesy, topography and cartography. 327-334.