R. Agus Sriyanta, Didik Notosudjono, Bibin Rubini

Judul	:	The Innovative Improvement through Strengthening Quality of Work Life, Situational Leadership, and Self-Efficacy by Using Scientific Identification Theory of Operation Research in Education Management (SITOREM)
Abstrak	:	The ability to beinnovative is becoming increasingly important today because the innovation process is believed to be the driving force for the development and growth of educational institutions. However, innovation does not appear without any effort from educational institutions.The purpose of this study is to find efforts to improve teacher innovativeness, namely by developing variables of work life quality, situational leadership, and self-efficacy. The method used in this study is a correlational study method to determine whether the variables in the study have a positive relationship with the innovativeness of the teacher. SITOREM analysis is used to determine priorities and recommendations for improvements that need to be made.The study population is all teachers in the Private District of Bogor Regency with the status of permanent teachers of the foundation. The sampling technique in this study used Multistage random sampling. Determination of the number of samples in the next study is to calculate the number of samples using proportional random sampling with Slovin formula to obtain 270 samples. Based on the results of quantitative research found that all variables have a significant positive relationship with teacher innovativeness. The results of the SITOREM analysis show that the components of situational leadership, teacher innovativeness, and quality of work life that require improvement are: (1) the style of delegation, (2) directing style, (3) relationships with colleagues, (4) pride & appreciation received, (5) learning media and sources, (6) teaching materials, and (7) learning methods and evaluations. The advice that can be put forward for school principals and teachers is to maintain indicators that have good value.
Tahun	:	2019	Media Publikasi	:	Jurnal Internasional
Kategori	:	Jurnal	No/Vol/Tahun	:	- / 7 / 2019
ISSN/ISBN	:	2349-0330/2349-0349
PTN/S	:	Universitas Pakuan	Program Studi	:	MANAJEMEN PENDIDIKAN
Bibliography	:	[1] Abbas, E. W., Hadi, S., & Rajiani, I. (2018). The prospective innovator in public university by scrutinizing particular personality traits. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 18. [2] Ahmadi, Freyedon et.al. (2012). Survey Relationship between Quality of Work Life and Organization Commitment in Public Organization in Kurdistan Province. Interdiciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 4. [3] Bandura, Albert. (2012). Handbook of Principles of Organizational Behavior Indispensable Knowledge for Eviden Based Managemen Second Edition. United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. [4] Blanchard, Ken. (2008). Situational Leadership Adapt Your Style to Their Development Level. Leadership Excellence, 25, 19.  [5] Cascio, Wayne F. ( 2006). Managing Human Resources. Colorado: McGraw–Hill. [ 6] Friedman, Howard & W.Schustack, Miriam. 2008. Kepribadian: Teori Klasik dan Riset Modern. Edisi Ke 3. Jilid 1.Translated by : Fransiska Dian Ikarini, Maria Hany, Andreas Provita Prima. Jakarta : Erlangga. [7] Greenberg, J. and R.A. Baron. (2008). A Behavior in Organizations. Upper Saddle River, N.J. Pearson Prentice-Hall. [8] Gayathiri, R and Ramakhrisnan, R. (2013). Quality of Work Life-Linkage with job satisfaction and job performance. International Business and Mangement Invention, 2. [9] Gibson, J.L. J.M. Ivancevich, J.H. Donnely, Jr. And R. Konopaske. (2009). Organizations: Behavior, Structure and Process. New York: Mc Graw-Hill. [10] Griffin, Ricky W and Gregory Moorhead. (2014). Organizational Behavior: Managing People and Organizations, Eleventh Edition. Nelson Education Ltd: Canada-USA. [11] Hardhienata, S. (2017). The Development of Scientific Identification Theory to Conduct Operation Research in Education Management. IOP Conf. Series: Material Science and Engineering. Vol. 166 (doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/166/1/2017). [12] Hellriegel, Don and Jr. Jhon W. Slocum. (2011). Organizational Behavior Chapter 3. Understanding Individual Difference. South Western: Cengange Learning. [13] Islam, Muhammad Baitul. (2012). Factors Affecting Quality of Work Life: An Analysis on Employees of Private Limited Companies in Bangladesh. Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 12, (18). [14] Ivancevich, J.M. (2010). Human Resource Management. New York: Mc Graw-Hill. [15] Krietner, Robert. (2009). Management Elevent Edition. Boston New York: Houghton Mifflin Hourcot Publising Company. [16] Kreitner, Robert. Kinicki, Angelo. (2013). Perilaku Organisasi. Translated by Biro Bahasa Alkemis. Edisi 9 buku 1. Jakarta: Salemba Empat. [17] Lewis, Pamela S., Goodman, Fandt, and Michiltsch. (2007). Management Challenges for Tommorow’s Leaders. US. Thomson South-Western. [18] Robbins, Stephen P. (2013). Organizational Behavior, 15 thedisi. USA: Prentice Hall, 2013, p. 376 [19] Rubini, B., Ardianto, D., & Pursitasari, I. D. (2019, April). Teachers’ Perception Regarding Integrated Science Learning and Science Literacy. In 3rd Asian Education Symposium (AES 2018). Atlantis Press. [20] Tidd, Joe and Bessant, Jhon. (2014). Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change. United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. [21] Triatna, Cepi. (2015). Perilaku Organisasi dalam Pendidikan. PT. Remaja Rosdakarya: Bandung. [22] Toha, Miftah. 2016. Perilaku Organisasi Konsep Dasar dan Aplikasinya. Jakarta: Rajawali Press. [23] Vandayani, P., Kartini, D., & Azis, Y. (2015). The impact of national culture on effectiveness of situational leadership Hersey-Blanchard. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 4(7), 78-82. [24] Wirawan. (2014). Kepemimpinan: Teori, Psikologi, Perilaku Organisasi, Aplikasi, dan Penelitian. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
URL	:	http://dx.doi.org/10.20431/2349-0349.0712005 ,www.arcjournals.org