Repository Universitas Pakuan

Detail Karya Ilmiah Dosen

Fory A. N Away, Benget Simamora, Salam Irianto Nadeak, Mulyawan Safwandy Nugraha, Indra Prasetia, Prasetyono Hendriarto

Judul : Decentralization, Centralization and Quality of Organizational Performance of Human Resources
Abstrak :

The success of an organization in achieving set goals is largely dependent on performance. A decentralized organization provides freedom of authority for lower managers to make decisions. This study, therefore, aims to analyse the effects of decentralization, centralization, and the quality of human resources on organizational performance. Data were randomly obtained from 105 people using the survey and quantitative approach. The study showed that the partial effect of decentralization (X1) has no significance so it isn’t accepted, Variable centralization (X2), and human resources (X3) on the organizational performance (Y) of the Rural Banks were positively and significantly accepted. Therefore, these three variables have an effect on improving organizational performance, thereby, delegating decision-making power to experts in need of knowledge on a particular issue, technology, product, or market. High centralization rates mean greater coordination and smaller flexibility, while decentralization is attributed to greater flexibility and less coordination.

Tahun : 2021 Media Publikasi : Jurnal Internasional
Kategori : Jurnal No/Vol/Tahun : 3 / 20 / 2021
ISSN/ISBN : 1939-6104
PTN/S : Universitas Pakuan Program Studi : AKUNTANSI (D3)
Bibliography :

Amirul, S., & Daud, H. (2012). A study on the relationship between leadership styles and leadership effectiveness in Malaysian GLCs. European Journal of Business and Management.

Banerjee, A. (2019). Failure of employee retention and its consequences on organization through content analysis. International Journal of Research-Granthaalayah, 7 (3), 200-207.

Cascio, W.F. (2010). Managing human resources: Productivity, quality of work life, profits.

Evelyne, E., & Juniarti, J. (2003). The relationship of information characteristics produced by management accounting information systems on managerial performance in manufacturing companies in east java. Journal of Accounting and Finance, 5 (2), 110-122.

Garrison, R., Noreen, E., & Pter Brewer. (2015). Managerial accounting. In McGraw Hill.

Ghozali, I. (2014). Multivariate analysis application using SPSS. In Gramedia.

Handoko, T.H. (2011). Personnel and human resources management. Introduction to Management.

Hansen, D.R., & Mowen, M.M. (2019). Managerial accounting. In Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling.

Karatepe, O.M., & Aga, M. (2016). The effects of organization mission fulfillment and perceived organizational support on job performance: The mediating role of work engagement. International Journal of Bank Marketing.

Muharam, H., & Chaniago, H. (2019). The role of entrepreneurial personality on competitive advantages and corporate image based on digital. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology.

Mulyadi, M. (2015). Social change from agrarian society to industrial society in community development in Tamalate District, Makassar City. Bina Praja Journal: Journal of Home Affairs Governance7 (4), 311-322.

Rivai, V., & Mulyadi, D. (2012). Leadership and Organizational Behavior. In Leadership and Organizational Behavior.

Robbins, S.P., & Judge, T.A. (2015). Organizational behavior. In Boston: Pearson.

Simamora, H. (2012). Management accounting. In Management Accounting.

Sumarjan, N., Arendt, S.W., & Shelley, M. (2013). Incongruent quality management perceptions between Malaysian hotel managers and employees. The TQM Journal.

Thoha, N., & Hutapea, P. (2015). Familiarization studies: Critical components in conducting successful fieldwork.

Widodo. (2019). Models of community learning center (CLC) management. 5th International Conference on Education and Technology, ICET 2019.

URL : https://www.abacademies.org/articles/decentralization-centralization-and-quality-of-organizational-p

 

Document

 
back