R Firmayanto*, Leny Heliawati And B Rubini

Judul	:	The Effectiveness of Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) Online Assisted by Virtual Laboratory on Students’ Science Process Skills in Acid-Base Materials
Abstrak	:	This study aims to examine the effectiveness of Integrated Content and Language Learning (CLIL) online assisted by virtual laboratory on students’ science process skills. The science process skills studied include the process of observing, classifying, communicating, measuring, predicting and inferring. This experimental research was conducted on students at Cahaya Rancamaya High School who used English as the medium of instruction in science learning. Student selection is done by purposive sampling. Data is collected through tests of science process skills. The results of the N-gain percentage analysis are 62% and in the medium category. The results show that CLIL online assisted by virtual laboratory is effective in improving students’ science process skills in acid-base material.
Tahun	:	2020	Media Publikasi	:	Prosiding
Kategori	:	Prosiding	No/Vol/Tahun	:	- / 1918 / 2020
ISSN/ISBN	:	10.1088/1742-6596/1918/5/052061
PTN/S	:	Universitas Pakuan	Program Studi	:	PENDIDIKAN ILMU PENGETAHUAN ALAM
Bibliography	:	[3] Singh V and Thurman A 2019 Am. J. Dist. Ed. 33 289 [4] Wei H and Chou C 2020 Dist. Ed. (United State of America: Taylor & Francis Group) [5] Murphy E, Rodríguez-Manzanares M A and Barbour M 2010 Brit. J. Ed. Technol. 42 583 [6] Nieuwoudt J E 2020 Austr. J. Educ. Technol. 36 15 [7] Mahoney J and Hall C A 2020 Exploring Online Learning Through Synchronous and Asynchronous Instructional Methods (IGI Global Publisher) p 25 [8] Liu J C 2019 Onl. Learn. 23 42 [9] Banegas D L 2012 Stud. Sec. Lang. Learn. Teach. 2 111 [10] Dale L and Tanner R 2012 CLIL Activities: A resource for subject and language teachers. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) [11] Coyle D O, Hood P and Marsh D 2013 CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Leanring. (Cambridge University Press) [12] Yumusak G K 2016 J.Ed. Pract. 7 94 [13] Stahre Wästberg B, Eriksson T , Karlsson G, Sunnerstam M, Axelsson M, and Billger M 2019 Educ. Inf Technol. 24 2059 [14] Herga N R, ÄŒagran B and Dinevski D 2016 EURASIA J. Math. Scie. Technol. Educ. 12 593 [15] Darby-White T, Wicker S and Diack M 2019 J. Comput. Math. Scie. Teach. 38 31 [16] American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) 1967 (Washington, DC: AAAS) [17] McComas W F 2014 Langu. Scie. Educ. (SensePublisher) p 89 [18] Duda H J and Susilo H 2018 Anatol. J. Educ. 3 51 [19] Sugiyono 2014 Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. (Bandung: Alfabeta) [20] Arikunto S 2017 Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik (Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta) [21] Fraenkel, Jack R and Norman E W 2012 How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education 8th Edition (Boston: McGraw-Hill Higher Education) [22] Hake R R 1998 Am. J. Phys. 66 64 [23] Monhardt L and Monhardt R 2006 Early Child. Educ J. 34 67 [24] Jansoon N, Coll R K and Somsook E 2009 Int. J. of Envnt. Scie. Educ. 4 147 [25] Correia A P, Koehler N, Thompson A and Phye G 2018 Res. Sci. Technol. Educ. (United State of America: Taylor & Francis Group)
URL	: