Abstrak |
: |
The study aims to analyze the relationship between English language skills and the students' learning outcomes in chemistry learning that uses English as the medium of instruction (EMI). This qualitative descriptive study was conducted on 40 high school students. Data is collected and analyzed in the form of the test result of the language skills and learning outcomes. The results for students' language skills: 75 % of students are at level A2 (primary user), 15 % are at level B1 (intermediate), 5 % are at level B2 (upperintermediate), and 5 % are at level C1 (advance/proficient user). The students' chemistry learning results are averagely low, i.e., 70 % of students gained a score under 75 as the minimum criteria of standard learning, only 30 % of students reached the score above the KKM (Criteria of Minimum Competency). The conclusion of this research is that there is a relationship between language skills and chemistry learning outcomes. Learning chemistry in English has not given good results for students' learning outcomes. Therefore, the demands of learning in English need to be supported by good language skills to understand the learning content
|
Bibliography |
: |
Albakri, R. H. (2013). Teaching scientific vocabulary to EFL learners using english: Content and language integrated learning. Arab World English Journal, 4(1), 269–286. Arikunto, S. (2006). Prosedur penelitian suatu pendekatan praktik. Rineka Cipta.
Ball, P. (2018). Innovations and challenges in CLIL materials design. Theory Into Practice, 57(3), 222– 231. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.20 18.1484036
Banegas, D. L. (2012). Integrating content and language in English language teaching in secondary education : Models, benefits, and challenges. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 2(1), 111– 136.
Bell, D., Martin, M., Wooff, D., & Mclain, M. (2016). Primary design and technology: Perceptions and practice. PATT32 Conference Proceedings.
Bello-Orgaz, G., Jung, J. J., & Camacho, D. (2016). Social big data: Recent achievements and new challenges. Information Fusion, 28, 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2015. 08.005
|