Annisa Nurramadhani, Suci Siti Lathifah, Yamin

Judul	:	Gender differences in science learning: how is students’ questioning quality through STEM based e-module?
Abstrak	:	Abstract. Science learning in this century has highly demanding for students’ outcome. Higher order thinking skills has become a main goal for science educator. Higher order thinking skills include critical thinking skills. creative thinking skills, argumentative skills, inquiry skills and others. Inquiry skills or questioning skills is highly important for students in science learning to construct that skills, students should have a curiosity. Learning strategy, method, and approach must be effective to promote it. One of them is STEM learning which is covered in technology such as electronic books. So, that this research using STEM based E-module to construct students questioning skills. However, there are differences of learning style, reading habit, and others between girls’ and boys’ students which effect their skill. Purposes of this research is to investigate how the question quality of girls’ and boys’ students using STEM based E-module in science learning. The method that is used pre-experimental with subject 26 students, 24 girls’ students and 2 boys’ students as freshman in second semester who take science courses in environmental theme. The technique to take the data in this research is used recording activity from Free Conference Call applications, reading test, and observation. The instruments such as transcript from WhatsApp application chatting group, Free Conference Call application recording activity, questionnaire, and “Pojok Inquiry” activity which is linked in STEM based E-module that consist of five reading material or narration for each sub-theme. Data analysed by using question quality category rubric. The results shown that there is difficulty to investigate significant differences of question quality between boys’ and girls’ students obviously. However, there are interesting results of the questions quality category results of girls’ and boys’ students. Boys has outperformed in understanding, relationship, and evaluation category than girls’ students, while girls’ students have outperformed in information, finding & solution than boys’ students.
Tahun	:	2021	Media Publikasi	:	seminar internasional
Kategori	:	Prosiding	No/Vol/Tahun	:	1 / 1806 / 2021
ISSN/ISBN	:	17426596
PTN/S	:	Universitas Pakuan	Program Studi	:	PENDIDIKAN BIOLOGI
Bibliography	:	Bransford J D Brown A.L & Cocking,R R 2000. How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school. Washington, D.C.: National Research council, National Academy press. [2] Dori Y J 2003 From nationwide standardized testing to school-based alternative embedded assessment in Israel: Students’ performance in the “Matriculation 2000” project Journal of Research in Science Teaching 40 34–52. [3] Dori Y J Barak M & Adir N 2003 A web-based chemistry course as a means to foster freshmen learning. Journal of Chemical Education 80 1084–1092. [4] Dori Y J & Tal R T 2000 Formal and informal collaborative projects: Engaging in industry with environmental awareness. Science Education 84 95–113. [5] Dori Y J Tal R T & Tsaushu M 2003 Teaching biotechnology through case studies Can we improve higher order thinking skills of non–science majors? Science Education 87 767–793. [6] Zohar A & Dori Y J 2003. Higher order thinking skills and low achieving students: Are they mutually exclusive? The Journal of the Learning Sciences 12 145–182. [7] Almeida P A 2012 Can I ask a question? The importance of classroom questioning. Social and Behavioral Sciences 31 634 – 638. [8] Chin C 2001 Learning in Science: What do students questions tell us about their thinking? Educational Journal 29 2 87-103. [9] Chin C 2002. Student generated questions: Encouraging inquisitive minds in learning. Science Teaching and Learning 23 1 59-67 [10] Yu F Tsai H & Wu H 2013 Effect of online procedural scaffolds and the timing of scaffolding provision on elementary Taiwanese students’ question-generation 56 2 484-494. [11] Becker R 2000 The critical role of students’ questions in literacy development The Educational Forum 64 261–271. [12] Rennie L J Goodrum D & Hackling M. 2001 Science teaching and learning in Australian schools: Results of a national study Research in Science Education 31 455–498. [13] Miller P H Blessing J S & Schwartz S 2006 Gender differences in high school students’ views about science. International Journal of Science Education 28 363–381. [14] Hawkins K & Power C B 1999 Gender Differences in Questions Asked during Small Decisionmaking Group Discussions Small Group Research 30 2 235-256. [15] Kennedy T J & Odell M R L 2014 Engaging Students in STEM Education. Science Education International 25 3 246-258. [16] Kaberman, Z & Dori Y J 2009 Question Posing, Inquiry, And Modeling Skills of Chemistry Students In The Case-Based Computerized Laboratory Environment. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. 7 597-625 [17] Cautinho M J & Almeida P A 2014. Promoting Student Questioning in The Learning of Natural Science. Social and Behavioral Science 116 3781-3785 [18] Wai J Lubinski, D Benbow C P & Steiger J H 2010. Accomplishment in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) and Its Relation to STEM Educational Dose: A 25-Year Longitudinal Study. Journal of Educational Psychology 102 4 860-871. [19] Liu Z M & Huang X B 2008 Gender differences in the online reading environment. Journal of Documentation, 64 4 616-626. [20] Wood C Pillinger C & Jackson E 2010 Understanding the nature and impact of young readers’ literacy interactions with talking books and during adult reading support. Computers & Education. 54 1 190-198 [21] Woody W D Daniel D B & Baker C A 2010 E-books or textbooks: Students prefer textbooks. Computers & Education 55 3 945-948. [22] Teixeira-Dias J J C Pedrosa de Jesus H Neri de Souza F & Watts M. 2005. Teaching for quality learning in chemistry. International Journal of Science Education. 27 1123-1137. International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education (ICMScE) 2020 Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1806 (2021) 012134 IOP Publishing doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012134 7 [23] Kintsch W ja Rawson K A 2005 Comprehension. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Edit.). The Science of Reading: A Handbook. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing 209–226. [24] Uusen, A & Muursep, M. 2012. Gender differences in reading habits among boys and girls of basic school in Estonia. International Conference on Education and Educational Psychology. Social and Behavioral Sciences. 69, 1795-1804. [25] Huang, Y. M, Liang, T. H., & Chiu, C. H. 2013. Gender Differences in the Reading of E-books: Investigating Children’s Attitudes, Reading Behaviors and Outcomes. Educational Technology & Society, 16 (4), 97–110. [26] Meyrick, K.M. 2011. How STEM Education Improves Students Learning. Meredian K-12 School Computer Technologies Journal. 14 (1), 1-5.
URL	: