Yossa Istiadi

Judul	:	PENGARUH STRATEGI KARYAWISATA DAN SENSITIVITAS EKOLOGIS TERHADAP APRESIASI SISWA TENTANG PELESTARIAN SATWA
Abstrak	:	Abstract The research objective was to find out the effect of fieldtrip strategy and ecological sensitivity on appreciation of wildlife conservation. The research was conducted to students of Public Secondary High School 22 (SMAN 22) Jakarta with factorial 2x2 design. The research results revealed that (1) there was no significant different on students’ appreciation of wildlife conservation between fieldtrip strategy in natural habitat with fieldtrip strategy in animal captive; (2) there was no significant different on the appreciation of wildlife conservation between fieldtrip strategy in natural habitat with fieldtrip strategy in animal captive of students with higher ecological sensitivity; (3) there was no significant different on the appreciation of wildlife conservation between fieldtrip strategy in natural habitat with fieldtrip strategy in animal captive of students with lower ecological sensitivity; (4) there was a significant interaction effect on students’ appreciation of wildlife conservation. Based on the results, it was suggested that in order to enhance student’s appreciation of wildlife conservation, fieldtrip strategy and ecological sensitivity approach should be taken into consideration in the teaching and learning process.   Keywords: Appreciation, wildlife conservation, fieldtrip strategy, ecological sensitivity
Tahun	:	2018	Media Publikasi	:	Jurnal Nasional Blm Akreditasi
Kategori	:	Jurnal	No/Vol/Tahun	:	02 / V1 / 2014
ISSN/ISBN	:	189 - 190
PTN/S	:	universitas pakuan	Program Studi	:	PENDIDIKAN KEPENDUDUKAN DAN LINGKUNGAN HIDUP
Bibliography	:	DAFTAR PUSTAKA Barrow CJ. 1995. Developing the environment, problems and management London: Longman. Borg WR, Gall MD. 1983. Educational Research, an introduction. 4 th ed. New York: Longman. Brown D. 1993. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. New Jersey: Prentice-hall.   Bryant PJ. 2000. Biodiversity and Conservation, School of Biological Sciences, A Project of the Interdisciplinary Minor in Global Sustainability. California. www.darwin.bio. uci.edu Buchloz RA. 1998. Principle of environmental management, the greening f business. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. Chaplin CP. 1975. Dictionary of psychology. New York: Dell Publishing. Silver CS, Ruth SD. 1992. Satu bumi satu masa depan, perubahan lingkungan global, penerjemah Lien Amalia, Judul asli:’One Earth One Future”, Bandung: Rosdakarya,   Chiras DD. 1988. Environmental science, a framework for decision making, 2nd. California: The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing. Gleich M, Maxeiner D, Miersch M, Nicolay F. 1993. Life Counts, Cataloguing Life on Earth,  New York: Atlantic Monthly Press.     McNeely JA. 1992. Ekonomi dan keanekaragaman hayati, Pengembangan dan pendayagunaan insentif ekonomis untuk melestarikan sumberdaya hayati, Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan. Pengaruh Strategi Karyawisata dan Sensitivitas Ekologis EDUSAINS. Volume VI Nomor 02 Tahun 2014, 190 - 190 Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CO. 1997. Megabiodiversity, Canada: Quebecor.   Nebel BJ, Wright RT. 2000. Environmental science, 7th Edition. New Jersey: Prentice- Hall. Odum EP. 1993. Dasar-dasar Ekologi, Ed.3. Yogjakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.   Okinski K. 2000. Deep ecology’s faulty ethics. www.green religion.com/ deepecology.html.    Pappas M, Tepe A. 2003. Follet’s Information skill models. http://www.pathwaysmodel.com/the- model/text/appreciation.html
URL	: