Asmak Ul Hosnah

Judul	:	Criminal Accountability of Government Officials Based on Discretion Authorities in the Perspective of the Indonesian Welfare Law State
Abstrak	:	In the framework of a welfare law state, a government has two sources of authority, namely legality and discretion principle. In the implementation of state administration, the two authorities are complementary. Government officials’ authority which only originates from legality principle of general welfare as a welfare state goal is impossible to achieve. The freedom of government officials to make decisions based on discretionary authority has a great potential to be abused which has consequences from the perspective of administrative and criminal law. In its implementation, the understanding of government official’s discretionary authority accountability principles among law enforcers still varies. Government Administration actions taken based on the Discretion Principle, as a form of deviation from the inability of Legality Principle to reach public dynamic needs, are inappropriate and deserve to be convicted. The legislators are better to normalize the principle of hulprecht in every provision of law in the field of state administrative law as long as it is ultimum remidium. Keywords: Accountability; Criminal; Government Officials; Discretion
Tahun	:	2019	Media Publikasi	:	Jurnal Internasional
Kategori	:	Jurnal	No/Vol/Tahun	:	Issue 6 / Volume 6, Issue 6 / 2019
ISSN/ISBN	:	ISSN 2364-5369
PTN/S	:	Universitas Pakuan	Program Studi	:	ILMU HUKUM
Bibliography	:	Aron, T. J. (1964). The concept of social discretion. USA: Service Press. Azhary. (1995). Negara hukum Indonesia [Indonesian law state]. Jakarta: UI Press. Basah, S. (1992). Perlindungan hukum terhadap sikap tindak administrasi negara [Legal protection for state administration acts]. Bandung. Fuady, M. (2005). Perbuatan melanggar hukum pendekatan kontemporer [Acts against the law through contemporary approach]. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti. Girsang, J. (2012). Abuse of power: Penyalahgunaan kekuasaan aparat penegak hukum dalam penanganan tindak pidana korupsi [Abuse of power: Law enforcement power abuse in handling corruption crimes], Jakarta: JG Publishing. Hamzah, A. (2014). Asas-asas hukum pidana (revision ed.) [Criminal law principles]. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. Kementerian Sekretariat Negara Republik Indonesia. (2014). Undang–Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan [Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration]. Jakarta: Kementerian Sekretariat Negara Republik Indonesia. Maramis, F. (2016). Hukum pidana umum dan tertulis di Indonesia [General and written criminal law in Indonesia]. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada. Muchsan. (1981). Beberapa catatan tentang hukum administrasi negara dan peradilan administrasi negara di Indonesia [Some notes on administrative law and justice in Indonesia]. Yogjakarta: Liberty. Patiro, Y. M. I. (2012). Diskresi pejabat publik dan tindak pidana korupsi [Discretion of Public Officials and Corruption Crimes]. Bandung: Keni Media. Prodjodikoro, W. (1993). Perbuatan melanggar hokum [Acts against the law]. Bandung: Refika Aditama. Ridwan. (2014). Diskresi & Tanggung Jawab Pemerintah [Government discretion and responsibility]. Yogyakarta: FH UII Press. Utrecht, E. (1962). Pengantar hukum administrasi negara Indonesia [Introduction to Indonesian administrative law]. Jakarta: Ichtiar Baru. Wahyono, P. (1982). Negara hukum Indonesia [Indonesian law state]. Jakarta: Radja Grafindo Persada. Yudoyono.(2013).Muncul fenomena pejabat takut ambil kebijakan, retrieved from https://nasional.republika.co.id/berita/nasional/politik/13/12/09/mxj4c9-muncul-enomenapejabat- takut-ambil-kebijakan
URL	:	https://ijmmu.com/index.php/ijmmu/article/view/1365