Repository Universitas Pakuan

Detail Karya Ilmiah Dosen

Rizki Kirana Yuniartanti, Wiwandari Handayani, Novida Waskitaningsih

Judul : Monitoring and evaluation effectiveness in flood early warning system project in Semarang City
Abstrak :

Semarang is classified as a vulnerable area towards climate change. As stated in vulnerability assessment conducted by ISET et al. (2010), Semarang experiences significant flood and sea level rise. Government of Semarang City in cooperation with several stakeholders conduct flood early warning system (FEWS) project, focusing on Bringin drainage sub-system in 2012–2014. Monitoring and evaluation (M&E) team is one elements of the project team. This paper aims to find out the effectiveness of M&E based on the stakeholders’ perception during project implementations. The results show that M&E team has been effective in four indicators: 1) ensure the planned outcome is achieved; 2) increase and support the project management; 3) create a common understanding with the stakeholders; 4) ensure the project accountability. Four other indicators that should be improved-include: 1) produce new knowledge and learning support; 2) motivate the stakeholders; 3) capacity building of related parties; 4) encourage public and political support.

Tahun : 2016 Media Publikasi : Jurnal Internasional
Kategori : Jurnal No/Vol/Tahun : 1 / 8 / 2016
ISSN/ISBN : -
PTN/S : Universitas Diponegoro Program Studi : PERENCANAAN WILAYAH & KOTA
Bibliography :

Semarang City Team (2012b) Risk Assessment and Planning. Flood Forecasting and Warning System as Climate Change Adaptation Measures through Flood Risk Preparedness in Semarang City, Semarang City, Indonesia.

The BTC Pipeline Project: Lessons of Experience, IFC (2006) September [online] http://www.ifc.org/envirolessons (accessed 11 September 2014).

The Public Service Commission (PSC) (2008) Basic Concepts in Monitoring and Evaluation. Commission House: Republic of South Africa, Arcadia.

UNDP (2002) Part 1. The Monitoring and Evaluation Framework in Handbook on Monitoring and Evaluating For Results, New York, USA.

Weiss, C.H. (1972) Evaluation Research. Methods for Assessing Program Effectiveness, Prentice Hall, Inc, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

Woodhill, J. (2000) ‘Working draft version 1 ‘planning, monitoring and evaluating programs and projects’, in Introduction to Key Concepts, Approaches and Terms, Switzerland.

Chapman, S. (2014) ‘A framework for monitoring social process and outcome in environment al programs’, Evaluation and Program Planning, Vol. 47, pp.45–53.

Estrella, M. (2000) Learning from Change Issues and Experiences in Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation, Intermediate Technology Publications, Brighton, UK.

Global Environment Facility Evaluation Office (2010) ‘Monitoring and evaluation in the GEF: how country stakeholders get involved’, GEF Expanded Constituenty Workshops Group Work.

Government of Semarang (2010) Semarang Development Plan 2005–2025, Semarang City, Indonesia.

Hermans, L.M. (2012) ‘An approach to design long-term monitoring and evaluation frameworks’, Evaluation and Program Planning, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp.427–438.

IDS Policy Briefing (1998) Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation: Learning From Change, No. 12, November, Brighton, UK.

Institute for Social Environmental Transition (ISET), ACCRN, MercyCorps, URDI and CCROM (2010) Vulnerability and Adaptation Assessment to Climate Change at Semarang City, Semarang City, Indonesia.

International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (2011) Project/Program Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) Guide, International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, Geneva.

Kayser, G.L., Moriarty, P., Fonseca, C. and Bartram, J. (2013) ‘Domestic water service delivery indicators and frameworks for monitoring, evaluation, policy, and planning: a review’, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 10, No. 10, pp.4812–4835.

Kusek, J.Z. and Rist, R. (2004) Ten Steps to a Results-Based Monitoring and Evaluation System, The World Bank, Washington, DC.

Larson, S. and Williams, L. (2009) Monitoring the Success of Stakeholder Engagement: Literature Review, CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Davies Laboratory, PMB, Aitkenvale.

Marfai, A., King, L., Singh, L.P., Mardiatno, D., Sartohadi, J., Hadmoko, D.S. and Dewi, A. (2008) ‘Natural hazards in Central Java Province, Indoneisa: an overview’, Environ Geol, Vol. 56, No. 2, pp.335–351.

Mc Kenzie, M.H. (2006) ‘Development of a participatory monitoring and evaluation strategy’, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp.365–376.

National Development Board (2014) National Action Plan of Climate Change Adaptation, Jakarta, Indonesia.

O’Donnell, K.T. and Galat, D.L. (2008) ‘Evaluating success criteria and project monitoring in river enhancement within an adaptive management framework’, Environmental Management, Vol. 41, No. 1, pp.90–105.

Rossi, P.H. and Freeman, H.E. (1988) Evaluation A Systematic Approach, Sage Publications, California.

Semarang City Team (2012a) Project Plan Implementation of Flood Forecasting and Warning System as Climate Change Adaptation Measures through Flood Risk Preparedness in Semarang City, Semarang City, Indonesia.

 

URL :

 

Document

 
back