Repository Universitas Pakuan

Detail Karya Ilmiah Dosen

Dwi Rini Sovia Firdaus, Djuara P. Lubis, Djoko Susanto, Endriatmo Soetarto

Judul : Potret Budaya Masyarakat Minangkabau Berdasarkan Keenam Dimensi Budaya Hofstede
Abstrak :

The shifting local cultural values often become a discourse in discussing the effects of globalization influx. But in Minangkabau these concerns can still be ruled out, thanks to the power of ‘study to nature’ philosophy. This is a custom rule that should not be changed. This study raises the popularity of the Hofstede’s concept and uses the six cultural dimensions to map out the differences in parental characteristics based on rural versus semi-urban areas, family typology and life experiences. It also analyzes the response of adolescents towards culture inheritance based on their birthplace. This quantitative study uses a simple summation operation with 106 sample respondents. Each respondent is a family unit consisting of a father, a mother, and adolescent(s) aged 10-19 years. The low score of LTO indicates that the inheritance of Minangkabau cultural values has been going on for some time by parents to their teenagers. Low UAI and IVR scores do not conflict with Minangkabau cultural tenet, although according to Hofstede this condition needs a revamping. Supposedly the value of matrilineal culture is taught by a Minang mother and her brother. However, anomalies were found in non-Minang father and Minang mother (nMF+MM) due to the absence of the mother’s brother in educating his nephew.

Keywords: Hofstede’s six cultural dimensions, core value, cultural inheritance

Tahun : 2018 Media Publikasi : Jurnal Nasional Terakreditasi A
Kategori : Jurnal No/Vol/Tahun : 2 / 6 / 2018
ISSN/ISBN : 2302-7517
PTN/S : Universitas Pakuan, Institut Pertanian Bogor Program Studi : ILMU KOMUNIKASI
Bibliography :

Anderson, B. 1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origins and Spread of Nationalisms. London: Verso.

Ardial. 2014. Paradigma dan Model Penelitian Komunikasi. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara

Attubani, Riwayat. 2017. Pepatah Petitih dan Adat Minangkabau. Padang: Createspace

Bartholomew, S. & N.J. Adler. 1996. Building Networks and Crossing Borders: The Dynamics of Knowledge Generation in a Transnational World. In P. Joynt & M. Warner (eds) Managing Across Cultures: Issues and Perspectives. London: International Thompson Business Press.

Baskerville, R.F. 2003. Hofstede Never Studied Culture, Accounting, Organizations and Society 28, pp. 1-14.

Catalin, P. 2012. A Critical Approach to Hofstede’s Model on Cultural Dimensions, “Ovidius” University Annals. Eco-nomic Sciences Series, Vol.XII, Issue 1/2012, pp.644-649.

Coon, H.M. & M. Kemmelmeier. 2001. Cultural Orientations in the United States: (Re)examining Differences Among Ethnic Groups. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 32. Pp.348-364.

Cray, D. & G.R. Mallory. 1998. Making Sense of Managing Culture. London: International Thompson Business Press.

Dimitrov, K. 2014. Geert Hofstede et al’s Set of National Cultural Dimensions: Popularity and Criticisms. Economic Alternatives, Issue 2.

Errington, F.K. 1984. Manners and Meaning in West Sumatra. The Social Context of Consciousness. New Haven, London: Yale University Press.

Evalina. 2007. Perkawinan Pria Batak Toba dan Wanita Jawa Di Kota Surakarta Serta Akibat Hukumnya Dalam Pewarisan. Semarang. Sumber dari :  http://eprints.undip.ac.id/17269/1/EVALINA.pdf. Diakses 7 September 2017.

Fang, T. 2003. A Critique of Hofstede’s Fifth National Culture Dimension. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management 2003; 3, pp 347-368.

Fougere, M. 2007. The Construction of the Modern West and the Backward Rest in Hofstede’s Culture’s Consequences. Journal of Multicultural Discourses. Vol 2(1). Pp.1-19.

Froholdt, L & F. Knudsen. 2007. The Human Element in Maritime Accidents and Disasters – A Matter of Communication, IMEC, pp.303-308.

Grenness, T. 2012. Hofstede Revisited: Is Making the Ecological Fallacy When Using Hofstede’s Instrument on Individual Behavior Really Unavoidable? International Journal of Business and Management. Vol 7 No.7. April 2012. Pp 75-84.

Hampden-Turner, C & F. Trompenaars. 1997. Responses to Geert Hofstede. International Journal of Intercultural Relations Vol 21(1). Pp. 149-159.

Hofstede, G & M.H. Bond. 1984. Hofstede’s Culture Dimensions: An Independent Validation Using Rokeach’s Value Survey. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 15(4): 417-433

Hofstede, G & M.H. Bond. 1988. The Confucius Connection: From Cultural Roots to Economic Growth. Organizational Dynamics Journal 16(4):5-21.

Hofstede, G. 1990. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Hofstede, G. 1991. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. London: McGraw-Hill

Hofstede, G. 2001. Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Hofstede, G; G.J. Hofstede & M. Minkov. 2010. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind (Rev. 3rd ed). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Hofstede, G. 2010. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. London: McGraw-Hill.

Holden, N.J. 2002. Cross-Cultural Management – A Knowledge Management Perspective. London: FT. Prentice Hall.

Huo, Y.P. & D.M. Randall. 1991. Exploring Subcultural Differences in Hofstede’s Value Survey: The Case of the Chinese. Asia Pacific Hournal of Management, 8. Pp. 159-173.

Jones, M.L. 2007. Hofstede – Culturally Questionable? Oxford Business & Economics Conference. Oxford, UK, 24-26 June 2007.

Kwek, D. 2003. Decolonizing and Re-Presenting Culture’s Consequences: A Postcolonial Critique of Cross-Cultural Studies in Management. In Prasad, A. (eds) Postcolonial Theory and Organizational Analysis: A Critical Engagement. New York: Palgrive MacMillan.

Lenartowicz, T.; J.P. Johnson & C.T. White. 2003. The Neglect of Intracountry Cultural Variation in International Management Research. Journal of Business Research, 56. Pp. 999-1008.

McSweeney, B. 2002. Hofstede’s Model of National Cultural Differences and Their Consequences: A Triumph of Faith A Failure of Analysis. Human Relations Journal Vol.55(1) pp.89-118. The Tavistock Institute, SAGE Publications.

Minkov, M. 2007. What Makes Us Different and Similar: A New Interpretation of the World Values Survey and Other Cross-Cultural Data. Sofia, Bulgaria: Klasika I Stil.

Minkov, M & G. Hofstede. 2011. The Evolution of Hofstede’s Doctrine, Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, Vol.18 no.1. pp.10-20. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Myers, M.D & F.B.Tan. 2003. Beyond Models of National Culture in Information Systems Research, pp. 14-29 (edited by) Felix B.Tan Advanced Topics in Global Information Management. PA, USA: IGI Publishing Hershey.

Myers, David G. 2008. Social Psychology.9th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Navis, A.A. 1984. Alam Terkembang Jadi Guru: Adat Dan Kebudayaan Minangkabau. Jakarta: PT. Temprint.

Roberts, K. & N. Boyacigillier. 1984. Cross-National Organizational Research: The Grasp of the Blind Man. In B.M. Staw and LL. Cummings (eds) Research in Organizational Behavior. Stamford, CT: JAI Press.

Schwartz, S.H.& T. Rubel. 2005. Sex Differences in Value Priorities: Cross-Cultural and Multimethod Studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, pp.1010-1028.

Smith, P.B. 2002. Culture’s Consequences: Something Old and Something New. Human Relations. Vol 55(1). Pp. 119-135.

Wu, Ming-Yi. 2006. Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions 30 Years Later: A Study of Taiwan and The United States. Intercultural Communication Studies XV:1.

Zuhro, R.S; Sumarno; Wenny Pahlemy; Nurul Rochayati; Lilis Mulyani; Israr Iskandar. 2009. Demokrasi Lokal: Perubahan dan Kesinambungan Nilai-Nilai Budaya Politik Lokal di Jawa Timur, Sumatera Barat, Sulawesi Selatan dan Bali. Yogyakarta: Ombak.

 

Sumber Online:

Profil Kesehatan Indonesia (2014) Kementerian Kesehatan RI.http://www.depkes.go.id/resources/download/pusdatin/profil-kesehatan-indonesia/profil-kesehatan-indonesia-2014.pdf. Diakses pada Agustus 2017.

URL : http://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/sodality/article/view/23229/15171

 

Document

 
back