Bibliography |
: |
Açışlı, S., Yalçın, S. A., & Turgut, Ü. (2011). Effects of the 5E learning model on students’
academic achievements in movement and force issues. Procedia-Social and Behavioral
Sciences, 15, 2459-2462.
Almeida, P. A. (2010). Classroom questioning: teachers’ perceptions and practices. ProcediaSocial and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 305-309.
Herawati, D., & Ardianto, D. (2017). Pre-Service science teachers socioscientific
argumentation: A decision regarding nuclear power Plant. In 2nd Asian Education
Symposium (AES 2017) (pp. 390-394).
Bates, S. P., Galloway, R. K., Riise, J., & Homer, D. (2014). Assessing the quality of a
student-generated question repository. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education
Research, 10(2), 020105-1-020105-11.
Becker, R. R. (2000). The critical role of students' questions in literacy development. The
Educational Forum, 64(3), 261-271.
Bottomley, S., & Denny, P. (2011). A participatory learning approach to biochemistry using
student authored and evaluated multipleâ€choice questions. Biochemistry and Molecular
Biology Education, 39(5), 352-361.
Breiner, J. M., Harkness, S. S., Johnson, C. C., & Koehler, C. M. (2012). What is STEM? A
discussion about conceptions of STEM in education and partnerships. School Science and
Mathematics, 112(1), 3-11.
Coutinho, M. J., & Almeida, P. A. (2014). Promoting student questioning in the learning of
natural sciences. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 3781-3785.
Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2008). Students' questions: a potential resource for teaching and
learning science. Studies in science education, 44(1), 1-39.
Chin, C., & Brown, D.E. (2000). Learning deeply in science: An analysis and reintegration of
deep approaches in two case studies of Grade 8 students. Research in Science Education,
30(2), 173–197.
Chin, C., & Kayalvizhi, G. (2005). What do pupils think of open science investigations? A
study of Singaporean primary 6 pupils. Educational Research, 47(1), 107–126.
Chin, C. (2001). Learning in science: what do students’ questions tell us about their thinking?.
Education Journal, 29(2), 85-103.
Collins, A. A., Lindström, E. R., & Compton, D. L. (2018). Comparing students with and
without reading difficulties on reading comprehension assessments: A metaanalysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 51(2), 1-16.
Daghan, G. (2017). Views of students about technology, effects of technology on daily living
and their professional preferences. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational
Technology, 16(4), 187-194.
Daryanto. (2013). Menyusun modul: Bahan ajar untuk persiapan guru dalam mengajar. Gava
Media.
Domínguez, C., & Jaime, A. (2010). Database design learning: A project-based approach
organized through a course management system. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1312-
1320.
Gilson, C. M., Little, C. A., Ruegg, A. N., & Bruce-Davis, M. (2014). An investigation of
elementary teachers’ use of follow-up questions for students at different reading
levels. Journal of Advanced Academics, 25(2), 101-128.
Hashim, H. (2018). Application of technology in the digital era education. International
Journal of Research in Counseling and Education, 1(2), 1-5.
Huang, Y. M., Liang, T. H., & Chiu, C. H. (2013). Gender differences in the reading of ebooks: Investigating children's attitudes, reading behaviors and outcomes. Journal of
Educational Technology & Society, 16(4), 97-110.
Istuningsih, W., Baedhowi, B., & Sangka, K. B. (2018). The effectiveness of scientific
approach using e-module based on learning cycle 7e to improve students’ learning
outcome. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 3(3), 75-85.
Kaberman, Z., & Dori, Y. J. (2009). Question posing, inquiry, and modeling skills of
chemistry students in the case-based computerized laboratory environment. International
Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(3), 597-625.
Kaldi, S., Filippatou, D., & Govaris, C. (2011). Project-based learning in primary schools:
Effects on pupils' learning and attitudes. Education 3–13, 39(1), 35-47.
Kalolo, J. F. (2019). Digital revolution and its impact on education systems in developing
countries. Education and Information Technologies, 24(1), 345-358.
Kennedy, T. J., & Odell, M. R. L. (2014). Engaging students in STEM education. Science
Education International, 25(3), 246-258.
Kintsch, W., Rawson, K. A. (2005). The Science of Reading: A Handbook, Chapter
Comprehension, Snowling, M. J., & Hulme, C. E. (Eds.). Blackwell Publishing.
Kizilaslan, A., Zorluoglu, S. L., & Sozbilir, M. (2020). Improve learning with hands-on
classroom activities: Science instruction for students with visual impairments. European
Journal of Special Needs Education, 1-22.
León, J., Núñez, J. L., & Liew, J. (2015). Self-determination and STEM education: Effects of
autonomy, motivation, and self-regulated learning on high school math
achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 43, 156-163.
Liu, Z. M., & Huang, X. B. (2008). Gender differences in the online reading environment.
Journal of Documentation, 64(4), 616-626.
Mardliyah, A. A. (2019, February). Budaya Literasi Sebagai Upaya Peningkatan
Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis di Era Industri Revolusi 4.0. In Prosiding SNP2M (Seminar
Nasional Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat) UNIM (No. 1, pp. 171-176).
McQueen, H. A., Shields, C., Finnegan, D. J., Higham, J., & Simmen, M. W. (2014).
PeerWise provides significant academic benefits to biological science students across
diverse learning tasks, but with minimal instructor intervention. Biochemistry and
Molecular Biology Education, 42(5), 371-3
Molenda, |
M. |
(2015). |
In |
search |
of |
the |
elusive |
ADDIE |
model. Performance |
Improvement, 54(2), 40-42. |
Moore, T. J., Glancy, A. W., Tank, K. M., Kersten, J. A., Smith, K. A., & Stohlmann, M. S. |
(2014). |
A |
framework |
for |
quality |
K-12 |
engineering |
education: |
Research |
and |
development. Journal of pre-college engineering education research (J-PEER), 4(1), 2-13.
Morrison, J. (2006). Attributes of STEM education: The student, the school, the
classroom. TIES (Teaching Institute for Excellence in STEM), 20, 2-7.
Nugraha, D. A., Binadja, A., & Supartono. (2013). Pengembangan bahan ajar reaksi redoks
bervisi SETS, berorientasi konstruktivistik. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 2(1),
27-34.
Nurramadhani, A., & Permana, I. (2020). Kualitas keterampilan bertanya mahasiswa dalam
kegiatan laboratorium sains melalui tugas membaca (reading assignment): Prosiding
Seminar Nasional Online (Webinas) 16 Juni 2020.
Nurramadhani, A. (2019). Profil kualitas keterampilan bertanya mahasiswa calon guru dalam
pembelajaran sains. Pedagonal: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 3(2), 1-9.
Papinczak, T., Peterson, R., Babri, A. S., Ward, K., Kippers, V., & Wilkinson, D. (2012).
Using student-generated questions for student-centred assessment. Assessment &
Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(4), 439-452.
Refirman, Supriyatin, Suprapto, M., & Jajang Miharja, J. (2017). Developing module
integrated multimedia with laboratory guidelines for high school students on human
circulation system (research and development). Proceeding International Seminar on
Science Education, (Vol. 3, pp. 287-292)
Saykili, A. (2019). Higher education in the digital age: The impact of digital connective
technologies. J. Educ. Technol. Online Learn, 2(1), 1-15.
Serevina, V., Sunaryo, Raihanati, Made, A. I., Juwita, S. I. (2018). Development of E-module
based on Problem Based Learning (PBL) on heat and temperature to improve student's
science process skill. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 17(3),
26-36.
Song, D. (2016). Student-generated questioning and quality questions: A literature review.
Research Journal of Educational Studies and Review, 2(5), 58-70.
Stohlmann, M., Moore, T. J., & Roehrig, G. H. (2012). Considerations for teaching integrated
STEM education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (JPEER), 2(1), 28-34.
Sugihartini, N., & Jayanta, N. (2017). Pengembangan e-modul mata kuliah strategi
pembelajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan, 14(2), 221-230
Supranto, J. (2000). Statistik: Teori dan aplikasi edisi keenam. Erlangga.
Teixeiraâ€Dias, J. J., Pedrosa de Jesus, H., Neri de Souza, F., & Watts, M. (2005). Teaching for
quality learning in chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 27(9), 1123-
1137.
Uusen, A., & Müürsepp, M. (2012). Gender differences in reading habits among boys and
girls of basic school in Estonia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 1795-1804.
Voithofer, R. (2005). Designing new media education research: The materiality of data,
representation, and dissemination. Educational Researcher, 34(9), 3-14.
Wai, J., Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., & Steiger, J. H. (2010). Accomplishment in science,
technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) and its relation to STEM educational
dose: A 25-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 860-871.
Warburton, K. (2003). Deep learning and education for sustainability. International Journal
of Sustainability in Higher Education, 4(1), 44–56.
Wood, C., Pillinger, C., & Jackson, E. (2010). Understanding the nature and impact of young
readers’ literacy interactions with talking books and during adult reading
support. Computers & Education, 54(1), 190-198.
Woody, W. D., Daniel, D. B., & Baker, C. A. (2010). E-books or textbooks: Students prefer
textbooks. Computers & Education, 55(3), 945-948.
Yeh, Y. C. (2009). Integrating e-learning into the Direct-instruction Model to enhance the
effectiveness of critical-thinking instruction. Instructional Science, 37(2), 185-203.
Yuriza, P. E., Adisyahputra, A., & Sigit, D. V. (2018). Correlation between higher-order
thinking skills and level of intelligence with scientific literacy on junior high school
students. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 11(1), 13-21
|