Repository Universitas Pakuan

Detail Karya Ilmiah Dosen

Dolly Priatna

Judul : Habitat Suitability Model to Determine a Suitable Area for Translocation of Sumatran Tiger (Panthera tigris sumatrae Pocock, 1929)

Abstrak :
Translocation has been used in human-tiger conflict mitigation for more than 5 decades, but the records show the success rate still relatively low. A comprehensive study is needed to determine the ideal and suitable area for tiger translocation within one landscape. Beside the physical characteristic habitat (such as the adequacy of forested areas, topography, as well as availability of ecotone and clean water), potential threats and the history of human-tiger conflict factors, it is very important to consider the factors of wild local tigers presence and their prey in the areas for the future translocation, so that the activities of tiger translocation can be more effective and the success rate will also be increased. In this study we developed a habitat suitability model of translocated tiger, and determined the areas that suitable for the location of tiger translocation in Ulu Masen Landscape. In 2008 we captured an adult female conflict tiger and translocated her 70 km from capture sites in Northern Sumatra. The tiger was fitted with global positioning system (GPS) collars. The collars were set to fix 48 location coordinates per day, and collected 6,680 points of tiger positions during 213 days of observation. Based on the habitat suitability model, 95% of the Ulu Masen forest landscape (approximately 7,500 km2) has the criteria of suitable and most suitable as habitat of Sumatran tigers (Panthera tigris sumatrae Pocock, 1929). Suitable location for Sumatran tigers translocation is a landscape where there is a mosaic of lowland forest with schrubs vegetation, has a flat to sloping topography, and elevation below 1,000 meters above sea level. The area should also be free from poaching and encroachment, as well as far away from villages. Predicted that there is a 388.10 km2 (5.2% of the total area) of area that most suitable, and a 2,135.67 km2 (28.5%) area that suitable for the location of Sumatran tiger translocation. Despite being preliminary the finding of this study highlight the conservation value of tiger translocation and have provide valuable information for improving future management of conflict tigers.

Tahun : 2020 Media Publikasi : Jurnal Internasional

Kategori : Jurnal No/Vol/Tahun : 1 / 9 / 2020

ISSN/ISBN : 2278-7666

PTN/S : Universitas Pakuan Program Studi : PENDIDIKAN KEPENDUDUKAN DAN LINGKUNGAN HIDUP

Bibliography :
Alikodra HS. 1990. Pengelolaan Satwa Liar. Jilid ke-1. Bogor: Ditjen Dikti Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Pusat Antar Universitas Ilmu Hayat IPB. Ambagau Y. 2010. Analisis kesesuaian habitat burung maleo (Macrocephalon maleo) di Taman Nasional Bogani Nani Wartabone [thesis]. Bogor: Sekolah Pascasarjana, IPB. Armistead AR, Mitchell K, Connolly GE. 1994. Bear relocation to avoid bear/sheep conflicts. In: Proceedings of the Sixteenth Vertebrate Pest Conference; Lincoln, 16 February 1994. Lincoln: University of Nebraska. hlm31-35. Bagchi S, Goyal SP, Sankar K. 2003. Prey abundance and prey selection by tigers (Panthera tigris) in a semi-arid, dry deciduous forest in western India. Journal of Zoolology 260: 285-290. Bailey JA. 1984. Principles of Wildlife Management. New York: John Willey & Sons. Bangs EE, Fritts SH, Fontaine JA, Smith DW, Murphy KM, Mack CM, Niemeyer CC. 1999. Status of gray wolf restoration in Montana, Idaho, and Wyoming. Wildlife Society Bulletin 26(4): 785-798. Blanchard BM, Knight RR. 1995. Biological consequences of relocating grizzly bears in the Yellowstone ecosystem. Journal of Wildlife Management 59(3): 560-565. Caroll C, Larson C. 2008. Modeling potential tiger habitat in Hupingshan-Houhe and MangshanNanling National Nature Reserves, China. Atlas of Maine 2008(2): article 9. Coelho CM, DeMelo LFB, Sabato MAL, Magni EMV, Hirsch A, Young RJ. 2008. Habitat use by wild maned wolves (Chrysocyon brachyurus) in transition zone environment. Journal of Mammalogy 89(1): 97-104. Craven S, Barnes T, Kania G. 1998. Toward a professional position on the translocation of problem wildlife. Wildlife Society Bulletin B 26: 171-177.

Dinata Y, Sugardjito J. 2008. Keberadaan harimau sumatera (Panthera tigris sumatrae Pocock, 1929) dan hewan mangsanya di berbagai tipe habitat hutan di Taman Nasional Kerinci Seblat, Sumatera. Biodiversitas 9(3): 222-226. Edwards GP, de Preu N, Shakeshaft BJ, Crealy IV, Paltridge RM. 2001. Home range and movements of male feral cats (Felis catus) in a semiarid woodland environment in central Australia. Austral Ecology 26:93-101. Endri N. 2006. Distribusi dan kelimpahan harimau sumatera (Panthera tigris sumatrae, Pocock 1929) dan satwa mangsa di Taman Nasional Kerinci Seblat, Jambi [skripsi]. Bogor: Departemen KSDHE Fakultas Kehutanan IPB. Fritts SH, Paul WJ, Mech LD. 1984. Movements of translocated wolves in Minnesota. Journal of Wildlife Management- 48(3): 709-721. Goodrich JM, Miquelle DG. 2005. Translocation of problem Amur tigers Panthera Translocation of problem Amur tigers Panthera tigris altaica to alleviate tiger-human conflicts. Oryx 39(4):454-457. Griffith B, Scott JM, Carpenter JW, Reed C. 1989. Translocation as a species conservation tool: Status and strategy. Science 245 (4917):477-480. Griffiths M. 1994. Populastion Density of Sumatran Tigers in the Gunung Leuser National Park. In: Tilson R et al.,, editor. Sumatran Tiger Population and Habitat Viability Analysis Report. Apple Valley: Indonesian Directorate of Forest Protection and Nature Conservation and IUCN/SSC Conservation Breeding Specialist Group Captive Breeding Specialist Group. hlm93-102. Guisan A, Zimmermann NE. 2000. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecological Modelling 135: 147-186. Hebblewhite M, Percy M, Merrill EH. 2007. Are all global positioning system collars created equal?: Correcting habitat-induced bias using threebrands in the central Canadian Rockies. Journal of Wildlife Management 71:2026-2033. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. 2000. Applied Logistic Regression. Edisi ke-2. New York: John Willey & Sons. Imam E, Kushwaha SPS, Singh A. 2009. Evaluation of suitable tiger habitat in Chandoli National Park India using multiple logistic regression. Ecological Modelling 220: 3621-3629. Jin XM, Zhang YK, Schaepman ME, Clevers JGPW, Su Z. 2008. Impact of elevation and aspect on the spatial distribution of vegetation in the Qilian Mountain area with remote sensing data. Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Science XXXVII: 1385-1390. Lancia RA, Nichols JD, Pollock KH. 1994. Estimating of Number of Animals in Wildlife Populations. In: Bookhoult T, editor. Research and Management Techniques for Wildlife and Habitats. Bethesda: The Wildlife Society. hlm215-253. Landis JR, Koch GG. 1977. The measurement of observer agreement for catagorical data. Biometrics 33: 159-174.

URL : http://www.ajcb.in/archive_july_20.php

Document

back

@official_unpak	@unpak
@unpak	UNPAK TV

Welcome Repository Universitas Pakuan

Student's Achievments

Unggul, Mandiri & Berkarakter

Detail Karya Ilmiah Dosen

Dolly Priatna

Judul	:	Habitat Suitability Model to Determine a Suitable Area for Translocation of Sumatran Tiger (Panthera tigris sumatrae Pocock, 1929)
Abstrak	:	Translocation has been used in human-tiger conflict mitigation for more than 5 decades, but the records show the success rate still relatively low. A comprehensive study is needed to determine the ideal and suitable area for tiger translocation within one landscape. Beside the physical characteristic habitat (such as the adequacy of forested areas, topography, as well as availability of ecotone and clean water), potential threats and the history of human-tiger conflict factors, it is very important to consider the factors of wild local tigers presence and their prey in the areas for the future translocation, so that the activities of tiger translocation can be more effective and the success rate will also be increased. In this study we developed a habitat suitability model of translocated tiger, and determined the areas that suitable for the location of tiger translocation in Ulu Masen Landscape. In 2008 we captured an adult female conflict tiger and translocated her 70 km from capture sites in Northern Sumatra. The tiger was fitted with global positioning system (GPS) collars. The collars were set to fix 48 location coordinates per day, and collected 6,680 points of tiger positions during 213 days of observation. Based on the habitat suitability model, 95% of the Ulu Masen forest landscape (approximately 7,500 km2) has the criteria of suitable and most suitable as habitat of Sumatran tigers (Panthera tigris sumatrae Pocock, 1929). Suitable location for Sumatran tigers translocation is a landscape where there is a mosaic of lowland forest with schrubs vegetation, has a flat to sloping topography, and elevation below 1,000 meters above sea level. The area should also be free from poaching and encroachment, as well as far away from villages. Predicted that there is a 388.10 km2 (5.2% of the total area) of area that most suitable, and a 2,135.67 km2 (28.5%) area that suitable for the location of Sumatran tiger translocation. Despite being preliminary the finding of this study highlight the conservation value of tiger translocation and have provide valuable information for improving future management of conflict tigers.
Tahun	:	2020	Media Publikasi	:	Jurnal Internasional
Kategori	:	Jurnal	No/Vol/Tahun	:	1 / 9 / 2020
ISSN/ISBN	:	2278-7666
PTN/S	:	Universitas Pakuan	Program Studi	:	PENDIDIKAN KEPENDUDUKAN DAN LINGKUNGAN HIDUP
Bibliography	:	Alikodra HS. 1990. Pengelolaan Satwa Liar. Jilid ke-1. Bogor: Ditjen Dikti Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Pusat Antar Universitas Ilmu Hayat IPB. Ambagau Y. 2010. Analisis kesesuaian habitat burung maleo (Macrocephalon maleo) di Taman Nasional Bogani Nani Wartabone [thesis]. Bogor: Sekolah Pascasarjana, IPB. Armistead AR, Mitchell K, Connolly GE. 1994. Bear relocation to avoid bear/sheep conflicts. In: Proceedings of the Sixteenth Vertebrate Pest Conference; Lincoln, 16 February 1994. Lincoln: University of Nebraska. hlm31-35. Bagchi S, Goyal SP, Sankar K. 2003. Prey abundance and prey selection by tigers (Panthera tigris) in a semi-arid, dry deciduous forest in western India. Journal of Zoolology 260: 285-290. Bailey JA. 1984. Principles of Wildlife Management. New York: John Willey & Sons. Bangs EE, Fritts SH, Fontaine JA, Smith DW, Murphy KM, Mack CM, Niemeyer CC. 1999. Status of gray wolf restoration in Montana, Idaho, and Wyoming. Wildlife Society Bulletin 26(4): 785-798. Blanchard BM, Knight RR. 1995. Biological consequences of relocating grizzly bears in the Yellowstone ecosystem. Journal of Wildlife Management 59(3): 560-565. Caroll C, Larson C. 2008. Modeling potential tiger habitat in Hupingshan-Houhe and MangshanNanling National Nature Reserves, China. Atlas of Maine 2008(2): article 9. Coelho CM, DeMelo LFB, Sabato MAL, Magni EMV, Hirsch A, Young RJ. 2008. Habitat use by wild maned wolves (Chrysocyon brachyurus) in transition zone environment. Journal of Mammalogy 89(1): 97-104. Craven S, Barnes T, Kania G. 1998. Toward a professional position on the translocation of problem wildlife. Wildlife Society Bulletin B 26: 171-177. Dinata Y, Sugardjito J. 2008. Keberadaan harimau sumatera (Panthera tigris sumatrae Pocock, 1929) dan hewan mangsanya di berbagai tipe habitat hutan di Taman Nasional Kerinci Seblat, Sumatera. Biodiversitas 9(3): 222-226. Edwards GP, de Preu N, Shakeshaft BJ, Crealy IV, Paltridge RM. 2001. Home range and movements of male feral cats (Felis catus) in a semiarid woodland environment in central Australia. Austral Ecology 26:93-101. Endri N. 2006. Distribusi dan kelimpahan harimau sumatera (Panthera tigris sumatrae, Pocock 1929) dan satwa mangsa di Taman Nasional Kerinci Seblat, Jambi [skripsi]. Bogor: Departemen KSDHE Fakultas Kehutanan IPB. Fritts SH, Paul WJ, Mech LD. 1984. Movements of translocated wolves in Minnesota. Journal of Wildlife Management- 48(3): 709-721. Goodrich JM, Miquelle DG. 2005. Translocation of problem Amur tigers Panthera Translocation of problem Amur tigers Panthera tigris altaica to alleviate tiger-human conflicts. Oryx 39(4):454-457. Griffith B, Scott JM, Carpenter JW, Reed C. 1989. Translocation as a species conservation tool: Status and strategy. Science 245 (4917):477-480. Griffiths M. 1994. Populastion Density of Sumatran Tigers in the Gunung Leuser National Park. In: Tilson R et al.,, editor. Sumatran Tiger Population and Habitat Viability Analysis Report. Apple Valley: Indonesian Directorate of Forest Protection and Nature Conservation and IUCN/SSC Conservation Breeding Specialist Group Captive Breeding Specialist Group. hlm93-102. Guisan A, Zimmermann NE. 2000. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecological Modelling 135: 147-186. Hebblewhite M, Percy M, Merrill EH. 2007. Are all global positioning system collars created equal?: Correcting habitat-induced bias using threebrands in the central Canadian Rockies. Journal of Wildlife Management 71:2026-2033. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. 2000. Applied Logistic Regression. Edisi ke-2. New York: John Willey & Sons. Imam E, Kushwaha SPS, Singh A. 2009. Evaluation of suitable tiger habitat in Chandoli National Park India using multiple logistic regression. Ecological Modelling 220: 3621-3629. Jin XM, Zhang YK, Schaepman ME, Clevers JGPW, Su Z. 2008. Impact of elevation and aspect on the spatial distribution of vegetation in the Qilian Mountain area with remote sensing data. Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Science XXXVII: 1385-1390. Lancia RA, Nichols JD, Pollock KH. 1994. Estimating of Number of Animals in Wildlife Populations. In: Bookhoult T, editor. Research and Management Techniques for Wildlife and Habitats. Bethesda: The Wildlife Society. hlm215-253. Landis JR, Koch GG. 1977. The measurement of observer agreement for catagorical data. Biometrics 33: 159-174.
URL	:	http://www.ajcb.in/archive_july_20.php